Council archive · source document
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHED · MCU26/0001
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Table 4: Retaining Structure Design Parameters
Unit Lateral earth pressure coefficients
Friction
Retained material weight Ka Ko Kp
angle (°)
(kN/m3) (Cantilever wall) (Non-yielding wall)
Loose Sands 17 27 0.38 0.55 2.66
Medium Dense Sands 18 33 0.29 0.46 3.39
Dense (or Denser) Sands 19 36 0.26 0.41 3.85
Future Controlled Fill* * * * * *
Note: * Depends on fill material type and level of compaction.
Retaining structures must be founded as per the recommendations in Section 6.3.2 above with the piled
footings, if required, also designed to resist lateral loads imposed by the retaining wall. Detailed design
must include an assessment of internal and global stability.
6.5 Drainage
Permanent surface diversion drainage should be constructed above the crest of any new cut or fill
embankment or retaining walls (e.g. grassed or landscaped swales or diversion mounds). Adequate site
drainage must be installed to ensure that stormwater runoff is directed away from building walls,
footings, batters and retaining walls.
Although unlikely, if groundwater seepage is encountered during excavations, Tectonic must be notified
to assess the impact on stability.
Subsurface drainage must be installed behind any retaining walls (e.g. slotted ‘aggi’ pipe wrapped in
filter ‘sock’ placed in gravel backfill). Depending on matters such as the extent of drainage installed and
site-specific groundwater conditions, the designer must make an assessment of hydrostatic pressure to
be accounted for in the design of the retaining structure.
All excess stormwater collected around the building (including overflow from rainwater tanks, etc.) must
be directed by pipes or lined channels to discharge into the existing stormwater infrastructure along
Bottlebrush Avenue. Subsurface disposal of stormwater must not be undertaken.
7. Conclusion
Based on the findings of our assessment it is assessed that there would be a Low Risk of slope instability
affecting the proposed development subject to implementation of the recommendations given in this
report.
Geotechnical Investigation
30 January 2026 | 25408-001-Rev0 16
Document Set ID: 25158026
24528612
Version: 1,
2, Version Date: 10/09/2026
13/02/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHEDRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.