Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

07/2555 - Operational Works - Drainage Stormwater Vegetation [As Published] · 142007.2555

of 216

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (14.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Attunge Heights Rehabilitation Specification 13

6.0 WEED CONTROL

 

Weed control is an essential component of site preparation as it helps create the conditions
necessary to facilitate both the survival of planted stock and the accumulation of natural
regeneration. Weeds are currently the major limiting factor for natural regeneration on the site.
All plants listed as environmental weeds by the Queensland Herbarium or listed as Undesirable
Plant Species by Noosa Council are to be dealt with using the range of techniques outlined in this
section. A range of techniques are available for weed control and the Rehabilitation Contractor
selected will need to select the most appropriate for each species and scenario encountered in the
field. The restoration ecologist should take care when applying these techniques to avoid any
native plants particularly the native seedlings.

6.1 CONTROL METHODS

Generally, a glyphosate-based product is suitable for the control of most of the weed species
present on the subject site, however other non-residual herbicides may be necessary to effectively
control certain species (such as 2,4-D for the treatment of Mother-of-Millions). The addition ofa
registered surfactant can reduce volumes of chemical treatment required along with a marker dye.
Marker dyes are best employed outside of areas regularly viewed by the public as they can be
unsightly and lead to the misconception that dangerous chemicals are being applied.

The only chemical permissible within 10m of the centreline of the creek or edge of the freshwater
habitat is Roundup Bioactive. No spraying will be undertaken in any drainage lines when it is

carrying water.

Table 7 identifies the techniques that can be employed on the site and Table 8 identifies the
recommended techniques for the known species of weed occurring on site.

Table 7: Weed control methods

 

Hand Removal

Removal of small weeds by hand. To be employed for weeds where the entire
root system can be easily removed by hand whilst minimising soil disturbance.
Care is necessary to ensure seed is not disbursed. Plants likely to restrike (eg
Singapore Daisy) or set propagules should be removed from site.

 

Crown or underground stem removal

Employed for plants growing from a solid central crown below ground level such

as Asparagus speringia:

* a blade is used to severe the roots from the central crown;

* severing the attached roots and removing the crown or underground stem
with the plant;

= seed heads should be removed prior to crowning,

Cut material and seeds are to be removed from site.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chenoweth EPLA 078103_Rehab_12_12_07.doc Dec ‘07

Used in these records

About this file

File size
14.1 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2555 - Operational Works - Drainage Stormwater Vegetation [As Published].pdf · 14.1 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.