Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Leanne Castro - MCU25/0118
Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
Email: [email protected]
Development Application Reference: MCU25/0118
Street Address: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy QLD 4563
Property Description: Lot (part) SP 348613
Submitter Details:
Full Name: Leanne Castro
Postal Address: 2/3A Kauri Street, Cooroy, QLD 4563
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 0493 362 331
22nd November, 2025
Subject: Objection to Development Application MCU25/0118
64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy QLD 4563
I am writing as a long-term Cooroy resident to formally oppose the above development application. I request
that Council recommend refusal on the grounds outlined below. My objection is based on both personal
experience living immediately adjacent to this land, and on the serious planning issues, community impacts, and
inconsistencies with Council’s own strategies.
1. Cooroy Is Not a Medium-Density Town – This Development Fundamentally Alters Its Character
One of the main reasons my family chose to live in Cooroy is because it is a low-density hinterland town with a
strong village character. Medium-density development to this degree is not appropriate here, especially not in an
established low-density neighbourhood. Cooroy simply does not have the infrastructure, transport services, or
pedestrian connectivity to support this scale of development.
The proposed density is more suited to an urban or major centre. It is completely inconsistent with the Cooroy
Town Plan, surrounding zoning, and the expectations of residents who purchased homes in this community.
2. I Purchased My Home on the Understanding That This Land Was Reserved for Cemetery
Expansion
When I bought my home, I was informed that this land was owned by Noosa Council for future cemetery use. It is
a reasonable and justified community expectation that land zoned for cemetery purposes remains so, particularly
when all Noosa Shire cemeteries are nearing capacity.
There is no evidence that this land is no longer required for its intended purpose. The site adjoins the existing
cemetery and is ideally positioned for future expansion via internal access. Once lost, this community asset
cannot be replaced.
3. This Application Is for the Wrong Type of Housing Under Noosa’s Own Housing Strategy
Noosa’s Housing Strategy distinguishes clearly between social housing (income-based rent) and affordable
housing (discount to market rent). The grant provided to Coast2Bay is for Social Housing – Income-Based Rents,
not Affordable Housing.
This application does not align with the category of housing the site is being used to justify.
4. Location Is Inappropriate – No Walkable Access to Shops, Services, or Reliable Transport
This is one of the most significant concerns.
Document Set ID: 24329345
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Leanne Castro - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 245 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.