Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Leanne Castro - MCU25/0118
The site is not within walking distance of the Cooroy town centre, medical services, or core shopping needs. The
distances significantly exceed recommended planning guidelines, particularly for residents with disabilities, older
people, or families without private vehicles.
There is no public transport servicing the site, and the nearest bus access is extremely difficult to reach —
involving unformed footpaths, steep inclines, and terrain that is unsafe and inaccessible in wet weather.
I know firsthand that bus services in Cooroy are infrequent and unreliable. I regularly have to drive my son to
work because there is no dependable public transport. Expecting future tenants to rely on buses that do not run
regularly or safely accessible routes is unreasonable and will reduce their quality of life.
5. Density Is Excessive and Out of Character
The proposed density is significantly higher than developments approved on actual medium-density land in Kauri
Street. The proposal places 26 units on 3161 m² — a density that is not seen anywhere in Cooroy and is out of
character with surrounding detached housing.
This scale of development:
• Sets a dangerous precedent for other hinterland towns
• Adversely impacts neighbourhood amenity
• Concentrates social housing rather than integrating it into the wider town as best-practice recommends
6. Severe Parking and Traffic Impacts
Cooroy already experiences serious parking shortages, and Council has no clear plan to address this. Within the
development, parking calculations are already below the minimum requirement, and do not account for:
• Care worker vehicles
• Visitors
• Overflow during community room use
• The reality that many tenants will own cars
There is no available street parking to absorb the overflow.
Traffic impacts on Dianella Court will be significant. This road was designed to service 28 houses — not a
medium-density complex. Resident safety will be compromised by increased congestion, vehicle manoeuvring
issues, and inadequate turning space for service and waste vehicles. These concerns have already been
demonstrated during remediation works.
7. Inadequate Landscaping and Cemetery Buffering
The minimal western setback and reliance on narrow screening vegetation provide neither privacy nor
appropriate separation between the development and cemetery operations. Landscaping constraints caused by
retaining walls and access paths further reduce buffering capacity.
8. Loss of Longstanding Community Open Space
Although not formally designated as parkland, this land has been used by the public for recreation for over 60
years. Its sudden shift to a medium-density development, without strategic planning or meaningful community
consultation, disregards long-standing community use and expectation.
9. Summary of Key Issues of Concern
1. A medium-density development is being placed within a low-density neighbourhood.
2. Land zoned and intended for cemetery use should retain its original purpose.
3. The proposed density is excessive, inappropriate and inconsistent with Cooroy’s established character.
4. The location is too far from shops, services and public transport.
5. The proposal will create hardship for tenants who cannot easily access essential services.
Document Set ID: 24329345
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Leanne Castro - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 245 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.