Council archive · source document
Appendix E Traffic Impact Assessment Report · MCU22/0038
Division 13 – Driveways and Car Parking Code
Table 14-49 - Driveways
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance Response
ü/û/NA
General
O1 S1.1 ü Complies with S1.1
Vehicular access does not adversely Vehicular access is located and The subject development does not propose a new
impact on safety, capacity and operations designed in accordance with access to the public road network but rather
of the existing or planned road network, the AS/NZS2890.1:2004; proposes to feed into a current driveway.
proposed driveway, cycleways or AND Notwithstanding this, the location of the basement
pedestrian pathway systems. S1.2 ü access ramp is consistent with the requirements of
Only one footpath crossing is provided1; AS2890.1.
AND Complies with S1.2
S1.3 ü The subject development does not introduce any
Driveways, have a maximum grade in new vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.
Complies with S1.3
accordance with Council’s standard
While the existing fronting driveways remain
requirements.
unchanged, the design of the basement access ramp
aligns with the requirements of AS2890.1.
O2 S2.1 N/A S2.1 not applicable
Driveways and crossovers— Design of the driveway across the The subject development does not propose any new
a) are suitable and safe for their intended footpath is in accordance with Council’s vehicular crossings of footpaths.
use; and Standard Drawing requirements as Complies with S2.2
b) match Council infrastructure. appropriate for the particular type of While the subject development does not propose any
development as annotated on the new public driveways, the basement access ramp
drawings; has been designed in accordance with the relevant
AND requirements of AS2890.1 and the swept path of key
S2.2 ü vehicle movements. It is however noted that the
Driveways are designed and width of the basement access is consistent with that
constructed in accordance with Council specified for Type B driveways on Council’s standard
Standard Drawing requirements , as drawing RS-051.
appropriate for the particular type of
development as annotated on the
drawings;
1
Justification for additional driveways may need to be supported by a detailed Traffic Study. See PSP 1 for details.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix E Traffic Impact Assessment Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.