Updated Engineering Plans · MCU14/0067

LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY
                   LTD


[OCR of page images]
 

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

fo be confirmed 100 = 1600 220,

 

Refer lst of landscope plants
on tandsape designers pls

| Top of extend
detention Gila,

she Fetinng wa 350mm gh

a 30 Tinga te Be

‘Din below suroce

conpark

avenant

 

 

 

   
 
 
  

ESL

 

‘ton Fiter Medi
‘Saturated hyraute
conduct “nn?

  

 

{0mm Toastan Layer
Ionrce Sand (05 ~ 7.0mm Neninal Sie)

 

 
  
   

oe
CR
RRRRRROR

 

280mm Drainage layer (Fine grovel
‘Som heninal Sze

inn Pefotated Pie at 05%
longitudinal grace towards evetlow pt

BIO-RETENTION BED DETAIL

[ee] AREA OF BIORETENTION BED.

varies

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

       
 

conpark

 

300
GRASSED SWALES

WY AREA OF GRASSED OR LANDSCAPED SWALE

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

  

y

minim

| 300

 

LANDSCAPED SWALES 300

Trin ae me Sr |

BIORETENTION BASIN DESIGN CALCULATION SUMMARY

Catchment Area

Catchment usage

Minor Storm Event

Major Storm Event

Adopted Storm Time
Developed Fraction Impervious
Travel length

Slope

Surface Roughness

Intensity for Return Interval=: 10
Intensity for Return Interval=: 100
One Hr rainfall Intensity for Q10

Soil Permeability

0.4005 Ha
Rural Business
10 yr ARI
100 yr ARI
10 min
0.9
77 m
0.01
0.2 QUDM
172.6877 mm/hr
249.1163 mm/hr
72.2511 mm/hr

L High/Medium/Low (H/ML)

 

DHETENTION #a5w ovERFLOW PIT NOTES

 

500

 

BIORETENTION CELL
INFORMATION

‘THIS BIORETENTION BASIN HAS BEEN
DESIGNED TO CAPTURE AND TREAT RUNOFF
IFROM THE SITE THEREBY REDUCING NEGATIVE|
IMPACTS OF THIS RUNOFF AND PROTECTING
THE HEALTH OF THE AQUATIC
WATERSYSTEM

 

800

 

 

 

INFORMATION SIGN - 1 OFF REQUIRED

Ho-retention basing,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60036006510 deep Stormwater Pit

i 25 ut sie
a Chess st PvE

BIO-RETENTION BED - PIT DETAIL

ete Wen Sort only DS

 

      

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/

Le

Fieretenton meio spatiotin sal bein occrdone ih the fsiy for Afvoncng BHtratbn.
“Cuielines "Sol Fifer Hedi in Bnretentbn Syste". retention hyrauiccondatily shal bein
cordance with the Fact for Aevaning Bbsitraton” Practee te cm Sty Measurement of
Hjcoule Condctiy” The numberof samples fo be tested shal bein acerdnce sith Pe "water
Sestve Ubon DesgeCestruin and Estobiehnen Gude - Seales, Sretantin Systene ond
Mellons (water by Desig

 

 

2. Under ltd rig pe uPVC or sir to AS 2438.1 or opprovad aminaan, 5% ML
grade. Refer project sawigs fer damatet ord inert level Typo ‘DOD. Pye shuld vet be
instoled whe filer sck surrounding pipe Undr-onoge pps sell be soled ini gis shy grout
ce ota opproved watertight #40

3. Refer to projet roving fr vetted batter los It 3 MAK, 1 typical end tater topo
requrenents

4 Filer lth — sen-woven gett. Fier lth rot tobe pled between ont fier loys apes
line noy te rege suber! fe 2 fectng reqranenis i cttdore withthe "Water Sective
Ubon Design Teta Design Guidelines” (Woe by Desig.

5. Basin ised surfve lee is Yop of fhe neda. Surface to be mulch ond planted as pr
landscape down.

4. Coretta folrones of acunnted in te “Woter Sensitive Urbon Design Centrcton ne
{stobehnen Guidnes~ Swales, Brenton Systeme of Melons” Woter by Dei ert be
xcieved. Construction fleraces ast berated on project plans. vert level of ps, pipes ond bose
Tevls must e noted on project rans

1. Rafe landscape rowing fer port spetotin, flan epctcten nd dest shall be in
corde withthe "Woler Sensitive Ubon Design Techel Design ueles” Water by Design

4 AL nein ve Wy mlinetres unless ofarvice note

SWPSOL DRAW CLEANOUT NOTES

1 Bioretuntin ned speciation shall te acerdonce wh the ocity tor Adroney Bistrot,

“Guiles for Sol Fifer Mein Biretenin Sytens™ Boreenhon hydraute cond hall en
accardnce th the Faity fo Advosing Sfratin * Procce Note ily Measurement of
Hyrouic Condy". Te number of sompes te be Tested shal be In occordonce wh the "water
Seretive Uton Dein Cre trtivn od Estobichnent Guidelines ~ Swale, Biretentien Syctene oad
Wetlands (woter by Dei,

2. Underrated ri pipe 0 4S 243.1 o approved equal, D5Y% HR. grade Rete projet
‘owingy fr daneter ond ver level (Typkally UNO), Pipe is stad be ued uring plunbing
fenett ips should wot be istled wih fie! cok surrounding pipe, Ubt-tahage pet shall be
Seale inte ps usng peut or other oppeved watertight sea

3. Refer te project cravings for vegetoed otter slopes It in 3 MAK
regiments

in typical and otter tps

4 Basin sed surfce level i op of titer nadia, Surface fo be nuthed ond lnted as per
Torscape dawg.

5 Ingernaoble or - HOPE, benoit, cenpacted cay ot oppoved equivalent te bose ond si,
instoled os per monfacarrs ond/er geletnlerghesr'sspeiation, Where congotted clay
liner is pte, fer cloth is fo be ase as pe toe & on PWEAD droweg WSUD-ON Refer 1 the
dat SemtveUrbon Design Centruction ond Extoblshmant Guidelines - Soles, Bireentn

Systems ond Wetlands” (wofer by Dei for dsl

6 Conetacton tolerances chcaented in he "water Senite Ubon Dein Cnetuctin and
{efablehnent Guidlines - Swoles,Biereteton Systems od Wellode” (water by Desi wart be
ttheved Construction flores wurt beefed on poet plot,

1 Refer landscape drawing for pont speiicatin. Pont speiotion ond dete shal in
xcardance itt the “Water Serie Ubun Design Techical Design Caelies” water by Desig

A neni ore in wilintre une oars nate

    

iter th estan 50 pater ade

  

 

st

  

 

 

 

 

SWALE SUBSOIL DRAIN CLEANOUT

 

LINDSAY CONSULTING {7
7

RPEO 4928

   
 

PH Su 792 118

 

THIS DRAWING REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD AND IS FOR
THE SOLE USE OF THE CLIENT. NO PART
MAY BE USED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT
PRIOR EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD

 

CLIENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
RON LOGAN
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

LOT 2 RENE STREET
NOOSAVILLE

 

DRAWING TITLE

BIORETENTION AND
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS

 

SCALES

 

 

SURVEY DATUM

 

VorTOStALE
BIO-RETENTION BED - PIT DETAIL
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD
Project LOT2 RENE ST, NOOSAVILLE Project Number 140821
Client RON LOGAN

RAINFALL VOLUME CALCULATIONS

SITE INFORMATION

 

L ==> Light cover bushland, or poor grass cover, or low density pasture, or low cover bare fallows

  
 

M==> Medium Density Bush, or good grass cover, or high density pasture, or zero tilling cropping
H ==> Dense Bushland
Minor Flow into Basin 140.00 I/sec
Major Flow into basin 263.33 I/sec
Maximum Basin Ponding depth mm
Basin Length m
Basin Width m
Number of Basins
Number of underdrains per basin
Bioretention Area 168 sqm
Filter Media Hydraulic Conductivity 100 mm/hr
Extended Detention Depth mm
Bioretention Area as % of total Catchment 4.1947566
VERIFICATION OF TREATMENT SIZE

Bioretention Area to achieve WQO
Total Suspended Solids (Figure 5.3 of WSUD manual) 90 % oK
Total Phosphorus (Figure 5.4 of WSUD manual) 72% OK
Total Nitrogen (Figure 5.5 of WSUD manual) 45 % oK

NOTE THAT AFOREBAY HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED DUE TO THE NATURE OF

THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (INDIVIDUAL INDUSTRIAL ALLOTMENT) AND

DUE TO THE PROVISION OF AGROSS PULLUTANT TRAPS UPSTREAM OF THE
BIORETENTION BASIN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project LOT 2 RENE STREET, NOOSAVILLE Total Site Area 4005 sqm
‘Comments Rainfall Calculations Limiting runoff from Site (Dia 450) 999 malsec (999 wids this check)
Permeable Pavement Area 0 sqn
ARR Intensity Calculation Data - As obtained from BOM IFD program ‘Storage in bio-retention basins 0 bm
Tnput Data Roof Area into Detention Tank 0 sqn
Duration Effective Site area (Site Less
ARI__[Ahr [2h [rahe Permeable Pavement Area) 4005 sqm
2 B23 10253. Travel length 7m
50 9396 23.81 8.66] Site Slope 0.01
‘Surface Roughness 02
ISkewness 7] Map 7 Land Description Lo UMD
IGeographical Factor (F2) 4.4) Maps Soil Permeability L High/Medium/Low (HIM/L)
JGeographical Factor (F50) 17.6|_ Map 9 Light cover bushland, or poor grass cover, or ow densty pasture, or low cover bare falow's
Medium Density Bush, or good grass cover, or high dersty pasture, or zero ting cropping
Dense Bushland
Un-Developed Fraction Impervious 0.45 From Fig. 4.05.1 in QUDM (2007) REVISION LIST
Developed Fraction impervious 09 From Fig. 4.05.1 in QUDM (2007) AL ORIGINAL ISSUE 27/08/14
One Hr rainfall Intensity for 10 72.2511 mnvhr
Calculated Travel Time 16 Min Must equal time selected for intensity
Adopted Storm Time 10 min
Detention Tank Provided 18000 It
Retum interval (ARD
7 2 3 70 20. 50 700.
Intensity (for Retum Interval) 3872, 726.58 755.57 172.68 195.88 26.13 249.12
C10 value 0790 0880 0790 0800 0790 0.680 0790 0880 0790 0680 C790 0880 0790 0.680
Fy Factor 0.80 080 0.85 «= 08S 0950.95 1.00 100-1050 1.05 1.15 1.15.20 1.20
cy 0632 © 0.704 «O8715 0.748 0.7505 0.836 079 0.88 0.8295 0.924 0.9085 1.012 0.948 1.056
Q (m3isec) 0.07 008 = 009185 015 O17 018 020 023 025 02 029 [fomputer File
Total Rainfall for event (m3) a7 o4 86 102 121 163, 176 140821CP.dwg
Total Non-Worsening Volume for Storm (m3) 48 65 9 104 12.4 187 8 DRAWING NUMBER SHEET] REV.
Roof Area Runoff for Storm (m3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14-0821-C3 3/A