Original source · versioned page text
Information response
Attached to the e-mail Response to Info Request, Landscape plans & amended Proposal Plans (1) - 1 of 4 - MCU16/0081.
REFERENCES/FURTHER READING
Cacioppo J and Petty R, 1982, The
need for cognition, 42(1), Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,
116–131.
Dunlop P, McNeill I, Stacy J, Morrison
D, Skinner, T, 2012, Preparing … for
what? Exploring the dimensionality
of community wildfire preparedness,
paper presented at the 3rd Human
Dimensions of Wildland Fire
Conference, Seattle.
Frost R and Shows D, 1993, The nature
and measurement of compulsive
indecisiveness, 31(7), Behavioral
Research Therapy, 683-692.
McLennan J, Elliot G, Omodei M, 2012,
Householder decision making under
imminent wildfire threat: Stay and
defend or leave, 21(7), International
Journal of Wildland Fire, 915-925.
Tibbits A and Whittaker J, 2007, Stay
and defend or leave early: Policy,
problems and experiences during
the 2003 Victorian bushfires, 7(4),
Environmental Hazards, 283-290.
Residents were not likely to delay making a decision on their action due to a lack of risk awareness, or
avoiding responsibility. Photo: CFA Strategic Communications Whittaker J, Haynes K, McLennan J,
Handmer J, Towers B, 2010, Victorian
or ‘evacuate’, or by increasing their risk The most important solution is to have
2009 Bushfire Research Response:
perception. A solution could be to transform brigades advise residents on how to
Household Mail Survey, Bushfire
their delay into a contingency plan that spells identify appropriate triggers and therefore
Cooperative Research Centre, East
out under which circumstances they would appropriate actions to take under a variety
Melbourne.
defend, and under which circumstances of conditions. In Victoria, households can
they would evacuate. This would also be in already get personalised advice on whether
own fire plans, which they then communicate
line with what a good fire plan would entail. they should even consider defending
to the community.
However, this may be problematic due to their house.
obstacles such as the complexity involved in Finally, random fire drills across neighbourhoods
Over the longer term, agencies could
making a contingency plan, and the lack of could help households to practise and improve
eventually reduce the community’s reliance
the necessary support from brigades or fire on the agencies’ advice by establishing better their plans. This is already undertaken in NSW.
agencies in helping these householders to links with the community and increasing It is clear that delaying the decision regarding
develop their contingency plans. community-driven education. Community individual or household bushfire response is
FUTURE DIRECTIONS members could then use this knowledge to a substantial and complex problem, which
help individual households to develop good will be challenging to resolve. It is hoped that
During the workshop for community
contingency plans. this study helps to clarify the problem and
engagement managers, the group also
identified several ways to overcome obstacles Fire agencies and brigade members should identify the strategies that are most likely to
to developing contingency plans. also model this activity by developing their succeed or fail.
Fire Note is published jointly by the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre Australasian Fire and Emergency Service
Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre Level 5/340 Albert Street Authorities Council
(Bushfire CRC) and the Australasian Fire East Melbourne VIC 3002 Level 5/340 Albert Street
and Emergency Service Authorities Council Telephone: 03 9412 9600 East Melbourne VIC 3002
(AFAC). This Fire Note is prepared from www.bushfirecrc.com Telephone: 03 9419 2388
available research at the time of publication www.afac.com.au
to encourage discussion and debate. The Bushfire CRC is a national research centre in the
contents of the Fire Note do not necessarily Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) program, formed AFAC is the peak representative body for fire,
represent the views, policies, practices or in partnership with fire and land management agencies emergency services and land management agencies
positions of any of the individual agencies in 2003 to undertake end-user focused research. in the Australasia region. It was established in 1993
or organisations who are stakeholders of the Bushfire CRC Limited ABN: 71 103 943 755 and has 35 full and 10 affiliate member organisations.
Bushfire CRC.
4 Background briefings on emerging issues for fire managers from AFAC and Bushfire CRC.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.