Original source · versioned page text
6. Noosa River DMP Ver0 (Combined)
Very large file (18.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 387, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
mitigation measures are undertaken, the completely covered (i.e. leave at least 2 cm of
development results in an acceptable significant the pneumatophores exposed); or
residual impact on a matter of state 2. Place replenishment material on either side of
environmental significance. the tree protection zone of this specimen and
allow natural processes to move the
Statutory note: For Brisbane core port land, an offset may only be sediment.
applied to development on land identified as E1
Conservation/Buffer, E2 Open Space or Buffer/Investigation in the The only other mangrove within the replenishment
Brisbane Port LUP precinct plan. For the Brisbane Port LUP, see
www.portbris.com.au. area has no visible pneumatophores (at the time of
the site inspection) and is located within an area
Note: For the purpose of this code, the matter of state currently subject to erosion mitigation measures. It is
environmental significance assessed is marine plants under the therefore, considered unlikely to be affected by sand
Fisheries Act 1994.
replenishment.
Guidance for determining if the development will have a significant
residual impact on the matter of state environmental significance is A group of mangroves, comprising seedling
provided in the Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department Rhizophora spp. and a mature Avicennia marina were
of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, 2014. Where
the significant residual impact is considered an acceptable impact recorded at the interface of the existing and proposed
on the matter of state environmental significance under the extraction area a Hilton Esplanade. The existing
Environmental Offsets framework and an offset is considered approved extraction area avoids this group of plants
appropriate, the offset should be delivered in accordance with the and it is recommended that the proposed extraction
Environmental Offsets Act 2014. area do the same.
At both Hilton Esplanade and Gympie Terrace
foreshore, Casuarina glauca was recorded. No
impacts to these specimens are anticipated at Hilton
Terrace as they occur on the top of the revetment wall
and changes to the ground level around their roots
will not occur.
Many of the C. glauca along Gympie Terrace have
had the roots undermined by erosion. Without
replenishment of the sand along this reach of the
river, there is a risk these trees will fall and/or become
a public safety risk.
If avoidance and mitigation measures proposed in this
report are implemented, offsets are not considered
applicable.
=
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 12 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.