Original source · versioned page text
6. Noosa River DMP Ver0 (Combined)
Very large file (18.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 386, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Restoration
PO29 Restoration does not: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO29 NOT APPLICABLE
1. compromise condition of fish habitats or fisheries
productivity; or Development does not involve restoration works.
2. substitute a particular fish habitat for another type
of habitat, for example, creation of mangrove
communities from other tidal fish habitats; or
3. substitute a natural fish habitat for artificial fish
habitat; or
4. deliver fish habitats that are likely to be regularly
disturbed, such as through predictable sediment
removal or maintenance dredging; or
5. deliver fish habitats that will predictably be at a
high risk of contamination and/or further
disturbance.
Note: For further guidance refer to Restoration of fish habitats:
Fisheries guidelines for marine areas (FHG 002), Department of
Primary Industries, 1998.
Restoration works authorised through an endorsed restoration plan
under the code for self- assessable development MP06 – Minor
impact works in a declared fish habitat area or involving the
removal, destruction or damage of marine plants, Department of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 2013, do not require a
development permit.
PO30 Marine plants to be used for revegetation PO30.1 Marine plants used in restoration works are PO30 NOT APPLICABLE
purposes have local provenance. collected within a 100 kilometre radius of the site.
Development does not involve restoration works.
Matters of state environmental significance
PO31 Development: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Can comply with PO31 via conditions
1. avoids impacts on matters of state environmental
significance; or One mangrove, located within the intertidal zone
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters of along the Gympie Terrace foreshore, has numerous
state environmental significance after pneumatophores. To minimise impacts to this
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably specimen, two options have been suggested in this
possible; and report:
3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all 1. Replenishment material be place at a depth
reasonable avoidance, minimisation and so that the pneumatophores are not
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 11 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.