Permissible Change Cover Letter, Form and Attachments

    -   A drive-through eases parking due to its holding capacity and customers
        using that option rather than parking;
    -   The inclusion of a drive-through facility changes the operational
        requirements of the cafe which influences the internal layout, which in
        turn has caused a slight increase to the GFA indoors but with the
        removal of the outdoor dining means that overall, the total use area will
        probably be less; and
    -   Locating a drive-through in industrial area reduces any potential noise or
        other impacts compared to if was to be located within a residential
        area.

The applicant has instructed Pekol Traffic & Transport to review the impacts of
the revised design, including the queuing requirements of the drive-through
facility. Pekol Traffic & Transport’s correspondence is included here as
Attachment C and confirms that:

        appropriate access and vehicle circulation is retained for a 19m petrol
         tanker;
        a HRV can enter and exit the designated loading bays without
         impacting on nearby car parking and landscaping areas;
        a large car can enter the drive-through from either the Eumundi-Noosa
         Road or Lionel Donovan Drive access, negotiate the alignment around
         the rear of the service station and food/beverage tenancy and this exit
         back on to Lionel Donovan Drive via the exit driveway;
        the drive-through layout provides capacity for 10 vehicles to queue
         (from collection point) without obstructing the Lionel Donovan Drive
         access.

Hyder Consulting has also reviewed the revised site plan and has confirmed that
the revised arrangements will be suitable to meet the water quality objectives for
the site.

Amended Plans
As a result of the changes described in section 2.0, the Site Plan and the Floor
Plan (for the service station and F&B tenancy), included in Attachment A,
supersede the approved corresponding plans. The revised Landscape Plans
included in Attachment B supersede the approved landscape plans.

Changes to Conditions of the Decision Notice
The abovementioned changes cause amendments to Conditions 2, 6, 23 of the
Material Change of Use conditions and Condition 8 of the Operational Works
conditions. The wording of these conditions is provided below, along with our
client’s submissions, and a recommended action. Proposed changes to the
conditions have been provided where relevant. Any new words proposed to be
included are highlighted in bold, while any words to be deleted are shown as
struck out.




August 2015              Empirica Developments Pty Ltd – Permissible Change Request   Page 3