Council archive · source document
100833_Council_Representation_260811 · MCU10/2065
Attached to the e-mail Representation on decision notice MCU10/2065.
Friday, 26 August 2011
Our Ref: 100833 / Office: Sunshine Coast
Council Ref: MCU10/2065
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
LOCKED BAG 72
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560
ATTENTION: Mr Marcus Brennan
Dear Marcus
REPRESENTATIONS ON DECISION NOTICE
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE - DUPLEX
17 GRANT STREET, NOOSA HEADS
Further to Council’s Decision Notice issued for the above development application, we make the
following representations in regards to Council’s approval:
Condition 10.3
Condition 10.3 requires a minimum width of 500mm of screening vegetation along the southern
boundary. While this can largely be provided it cannot be achieved adjacent to the garage and the
section of driveway providing access to the garage. Given that Council has approved a reduced
setback for the garage, this condition imposes an unreasonable imposition on the development.
Accordingly, we request that Condition 10.3 be amended to only require a minimum width of 500mm
of screening vegetation along the southern boundary other than adjoining the garage and the built to
boundary driveway section shown on the approved plan.
Condition 12
Condition 12 requires the front fencing to be setback at least 1m from the front property boundary,
with at least half the fencing setback 2m; or where on the property boundary less than 1.2m in height
or of open construction.
As detailed in the response to the information request, the front fence is articulated and setback 1 –
2m from the frontage with soft landscaping between the fence and frontage in accordance with
probable solutions S38.1 and S38.2 of the specific outcomes and probable solutions for the Semi-
attached Housing Zone. All sections of the frontage comprise soft landscape with the exception of
areas required for pedestrian or vehicular access. Specifically, S38.1 requires fencing to be setback
an average of 1m. There is nothing in the planning scheme that requires at least half the fencing to
be setback 2m. In this regard this condition is neither relevant to nor reasonably required and is an
unreasonable imposition on the development.
Brisbane Sunshine Coast North Queensland
p f p f
p f
Sunshine Coast
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Accordingly, we request that Condition 12 be amended to require the front fencing to be setback at least 1m and articulated, generally in accordance with the approved plans; or where on the property boundary less than 1.2m in height or of open construction. Condition 22 Condition 22 requires a 1.5m concrete footpath along the frontage of the site. Given that a 1.5m concrete footpath has not been required with other duplex developments in the street this condition is neither relevant to nor reasonably required and is an unreasonable imposition of the development. Further, given the physical width of the footpath reserve and intrusions such as a drainage grate, power box and light pole, a 1.5m concrete footpath is not achievable. Accordingly, we request that Condition 12 be deleted. Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct. Yours faithfully KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Scott Sobey DIRECTOR
Used in these records
100833_Council_Representation_260811.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 248 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.