Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

100833_Council_Representation_260811 · MCU10/2065

Attached to the e-mail Representation on decision notice MCU10/2065.

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Accordingly, we request that Condition 12 be amended to require the front fencing to be setback at
least 1m and articulated, generally in accordance with the approved plans; or where on the property
boundary less than 1.2m in height or of open construction.


Condition 22
Condition 22 requires a 1.5m concrete footpath along the frontage of the site. Given that a 1.5m
concrete footpath has not been required with other duplex developments in the street this condition is
neither relevant to nor reasonably required and is an unreasonable imposition of the development.
Further, given the physical width of the footpath reserve and intrusions such as a drainage grate,
power box and light pole, a 1.5m concrete footpath is not achievable.

Accordingly, we request that Condition 12 be deleted.



Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct.

Yours faithfully
KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS




Scott Sobey
DIRECTOR

Used in these records

About this file

File size
248 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

100833_Council_Representation_260811.pdf · 248 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.