Council archive · source document
Cover Letter_Precinct E2_CDA_07-11-2018 · MCU15/0109.03
Attached to the e-mail Change to DA (39 units) - MCU15/0109.03.
1. The proposed changes do not involve a new use.
Comment: The overall development is retained as an integrated multiple dwelling development, now
comprising 39 dwelling units. No new buildings are proposed with the changes relating to unit mix and
numbers are located within the built form of Blocks 23, 24 and 25. There are no new uses proposed that
would create different or additional impacts.
The proposed amended development is therefore not anticipated as having different or additional impacts
to that which has previously assessed and determined as appropriate.
2. The proposed changes do not result in the application applying to a new parcel of land.
Comment: The proposed changes relate to the Blocks 23, 24 & 25 and do not result in the application
applying to a new parcel of land.
3. The proposed changes do not dramatically change the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.
Comment: Built form does not substantially differ from the existing approval, with buildings sited and
oriented in similar locations. Likewise, individual building footprints do not change significantly as a
consequence of the proposed changes.
4. The proposed changes do not change the ability of the proposal to operate as intended.
Comment: The proposed changes will not affect the ability of the proposal to operate as intended i.e. as
an integrated residential community.
5. The proposed changes do not remove a component that is integral to the operation of the development.
Comment: The proposed changes do not seek to remove any components from the previous permissible
change approval. Instead, the changes seek to facilitate a change to the mix of unit product within Blocks
23, 24 and 25 to the allowable density of 100 persons per hectare and of a similar nature as the original
approval.
6. The proposed changes do not significantly impact on traffic flow and the transport network, such as
increasing traffic to the site.
Comment: As demonstrated in the response to point 1. above, the proposed changes to unit product and
numbers are not anticipated as generating significant impacts on traffic flow or the existing road network
beyond what was already anticipated under the original development approval.
JFP Ref: M2652/E2 Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Cover Letter_Precinct E2_CDA_07-11-2018.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 505 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.