Council archive · source document
11428_Council_Change to DA_190515 · MCU13/0030
Attached to the e-mail MCU13/0030.01 Request to Change Existing Approval (layout & carparking) Email 1 of 1.
o New reception area within the existing veranda entrance fronting the Miva Street entry
driveway.
Extension of existing Topaz Street Portico roofing and conversion of part of area to a screened
veranda for resident use and part to a covered ambulance bay
Roofing over existing bin area at the Topaz Street frontage.
Permissible Change Assessment
Section 367 of Sustainable Planning Act 2009 states:
(1) A permissible change, for a development approval, is a change to the approval that
would not—
(a) result in a substantially different development; or
In respect to what constitutes a ‘substantially different development’, specific reference is
made to the statutory guidelines pursuant to section 769 of the SPA (Statutory Guideline
06/09):
“Although it will depend on the individual circumstances of the development, the following list
identifies changes that may result in a substantially different development and would,
therefore, not be a minor change or permissible change under the SPA. This list is intended as
a guide to assist assessment managers and applicants to determine whether a change will
result in a substantially different development and is not intended to be exhaustive.
Involves a new use with different or additional impacts.
Comment: The proposed changes do not establish any new uses with different or
additional impacts.
Results in the application applying to a new parcel of land.
Comment: The proposed changes do not involve any new parcels of land
Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance
Comment: The proposed changes will not dramatically change the built form in terms of
scale, bulk and appearance
Changes the ability of the proposal to operate as intended.
Comment: The proposed changes will not change the ability of the proposal to operate as
intended.
Removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development
Comment: The proposed changes do not remove a component that is integral to the
operation of the development.
Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic
to the site.
Comment: The proposed changes will not significantly impact on traffic flow and the
transport network, such as increasing traffic to the site.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
11428_Council_Change to DA_190515.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 454 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.