Council archive · source document
11428_Council_Change to DA_190515 · MCU13/0030
Attached to the e-mail MCU13/0030.01 Request to Change Existing Approval (layout & carparking) Email 1 of 1.
Introduces new impacts or increases the severity of known impacts.
Comment: The proposed changes do not introduce new impacts or increases the severity
of known impacts.
Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced the negative impact
of the development.
Comment: The proposed changes do not remove an incentive or offset component that
would have balanced the negative impact of the development.
Impacts on infrastructure provision from a location or demand.
Comment: The proposed change will have the same impact on infrastructure provision.
(b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change—
(i) require referral to additional concurrence agencies;
Comment: The proposed change would not require the application to be referred to
additional concurrence agencies.
or
(ii) for an approval for assessable development that previously did not
require impact assessment—require impact assessment; or
Comment: The original application required code assessment and the proposed
change does not change this assessment level.
(c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact
assessment—be likely, in the responsible entity’s opinion, to cause a person to
make a properly made submission objecting to the proposed change, if the
circumstances allowed; or
Comment: The original application required code assessment.
(d) cause development to which the approval relates to include any prohibited
development.
Comment: The proposed change does not propose the inclusion of any prohibited
development.
(2) For deciding whether a change is a permissible change under subsection (1)(b) or (d),
the planning instruments or law in force at the time the request for the change was
made apply (the applicable law).
Comment: There has been no change to the planning scheme or applicable law since the original
approval.
Conclusion
In light of the above, it is considered that the proposed changes to the development comply with the
provisions of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, as they are minor in nature and do not offend the
intent of the original approval. Approval of the request to change the development approval is
therefore warranted.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
11428_Council_Change to DA_190515.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 454 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.