Original source · versioned page text
2015-03-31 I&S Committee - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Munna Pt Bridge Repairs Level 3 Bridge Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
• Deck units in good condition typically have a large factor of safety for structural
capacity, so that the good units will compensate for the lost strength in the ones
suffering from ASR.
• The good deck units are likely to suffer ASR cracking and reinforcement corrosion
sometime between now and 2016. The repair bill for the deck units will grow
exponentially, unless action is taken soon.
o Headstocks
• The headstocks have not cracked
• Headstock reinforcement is likely to be 100% intact
o Columns
• Column reinforcement is likely to be 100% intact. A few more tests will be
required to confirm this.
o Pilecap Beams
• The top and side reinforcement cover exceeds the 75mm shown on the original
drawings, and adopted in the TMR and Opus reports. Tod Consulting measured
top cover was 100mm, and measured side cover was 89 to 93mm.
• Reinforcement near the top centre of the pilecap beams has not corroded.
• Reinforcement near the sides of pilecap beams has significantly corroded, to the
point of being ineffective.
• Reinforcement near the bottom of pilecap beams is probably starting to corrode
now.
• On this basis, 75-85% of the top reinforcement is likely to still be intact; 50-80% of
the bottom reinforcement is likely to still be intact, and 66% of the shear
ligatures/stirrups are likely to still be intact.
• It is likely that the corroding reinforcement on the sides (and potentially bottom) of
the pilecap beams has protected the rest of the reinforcement due to Macrocells
(wetting-drying cycles of saltwater against part of the concrete can result in an
anodic area that promotes local corrosion of reinforcement. The anodic
reinforcement is sacrificed to temporarily protect the electrically connected, more
passive reinforcement away from that area).
• ASR cracking will continue, and we anticipate that reinforcement will corrode
heavily, making the bridge dangerous by 2015.
o Piles
• The majority of the reinforcement in the piles is likely to be intact, based on the
two piles where we removed concrete and observed the reinforcement condition.
This is because most of each pile is underwater; with reduced oxygen making the
rate of corrosion slower. However, at the pile tops (in the tidal zone), it’s probable
that the reinforcement has corroded, but it hadn’t spalled (broken) off the concrete
faces at the time of the February 2014 inspections. We expect that significant
corrosion of all piles could start in the next 1-3 years (2015-2017), making the
bridge dangerous and increasingly costly to repair by 2017.
Page 22 of 31
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.