Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

2016-10-17 General Committee Meeting Notes

of 67

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (11.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   17 OCTOBER 2016




                                      Page 43 of 67

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                                     17 OCTOBER 2016

               5.0     CONCLUSION.

                       The building is generally in satisfactory condition having due regard for the age, type and
                       location of the building.

                       The serviceable life of the building can be extended significantly if the items mentioned in
                       this report are addressed in a timely manner.

                       It is noted that there are some areas of the roof that should be addressed as soon as
                       possible in order to maintain the structural integrity of these areas.
                       The other items noted in Red, are critical items that should be carried out as soon as
                       possible.
                       The Items noted in green, should be carried out before the building is reoccupied/used.
                       The items identified in blue can be addressed whilst the building is being used.

                       The estimated cost to address these items noted in red and green, would be between three
                       Hundred and Four Hundred Thousand dollars to bring the building up to a standard that
                       would allow it to be reoccupied safely.
                       It is critical that the works be managed on a strict work program and budget.
                       To arrive at a firm dollar value with some contingencies, would require a Scope of Works to
                       be prepared. This has been allowed for within the aforementioned estimate.
                       To bring the COOROY MEMORIAL HALL & SCHOOL OF ARTS back to a pristine condition
                       would generally double the budget, that is it would be prudent to allow Eight Hundred
                       Thousand to One Million Dollars.

                       | would recommend that the items that may impinge on the safety of the occupants or the
                       structural integrity of the building and the associated attachments are attended to as soon
                       as possible.

                       Should there be any questions in regard to this report or any questions about the building
                       and the associated attachments, then please contact the author by telephone and in writing
                       and | will address same.

               Yours faithfully,

               D.L. MONTGOMERIE.

               Independent Building Inspections
               QBCC Lic.N* 4806
               & Abbey Pest Management.
               Lic N° 13779                                                                         Page 19 of 19.

                                                                                                             19

                                                                                                            Page 43 of 67
Log in to download the original file

2016-10-17 General Committee Meeting Notes(PDF, 11MB).pdf · 11.2 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.