Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Table 6.2.2: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Network impacts
PO1 Development does not result in a worsening of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO1 - The Traffic Engineering
safety of a state-controlled road. Assessment prepared by Traffic and Transport Plus
(refer Appendix F) has confirmed that the additional
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance traffic generated (associated with the proposed hotel)
outcome, it is recommended that a Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified road safety audit
would be significantly less than 5% of the Base Traffic
or road safety assessment (as applicable) is provided. Volumes on the approaches to the roundabout in
2023 (the opening year of the site).
Further information on determining whether a road safety
audit or road safety assessment is required is provided in The additional traffic expected to be generated by the
section 9 of the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, proposed development will have a negligible impact
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017. on the operation of the Leslie Drive / Cooyar Street /
Tarina Street / Noosa Springs Drive roundabout
intersection, and surrounding road network, which will
continue to operate well within acceptable capacity
thresholds.
PO2 Development does not result in a worsening of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO2 – Given the advice provided
infrastructure condition of a state-controlled road or road above, the proposed development will not have a
transport infrastructure. measurable impact upon the state-controlled or road
transport infrastructure.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified traffic
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment and pavement impact assessment is provided
in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO3 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO3 – The advice provided above,
operating conditions on a state-controlled road or the proposed development will not result in a worsening
surrounding road network. of operating conditions on a state-controlled road or
the surrounding road network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome,
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 1 of 10
[OCR of page images]
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Table 6.2.2: All develooment
eae Le mel el Coxe} Acceptable outcomes
Network impacts
cos
PO1 Development does not result in a worsening of the
safety of a state-controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that a Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified road safety audit
or road safety assessment (as applicable) is provided.
Further information on determining whether a road safety
audit or road safety assessment is required is provided in
section 9 of the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO1 - The Traffic Engineering
Assessment prepared by Traffic and Transport Plus
(refer Appendix F) has confirmed that the additional
traffic generated (associated with the proposed hotel)
would be significantly less than 5% of the Base Traffic
Volumes on the approaches to the roundabout in
2023 (the opening year of the site).
The additional traffic expected to be generated by the
proposed development will have a negligible impact
on the operation of the Leslie Drive / Cooyar Street /
Tarina Street / Noosa Springs Drive roundabout
intersection, and surrounding road network, which will
continue to operate well within acceptable capacity
thresholds.
PO2 Development does not result in a worsening of the
infrastructure condition of a state-controlled road or road
transport infrastructure.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified traffic
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment and pavement impact assessment is provided
in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO2 — Given the advice provided
above, the proposed development will not have a
measurable impact upon the state-controlled or road
transport infrastructure.
PO3 Development does not result in a worsening of
operating conditions on a state-controlled road or the
surrounding road network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome,
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO3 — The advice provided above,
proposed development will not result in a worsening
of operating conditions on a state-controlled road or
the surrounding road network.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 1 of 10
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 11 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
it is recommended that an RPEQ certified traffic impact
assessment is provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO4 Development does not impose traffic loadings on a AO4.1 The layout and design of the development Complies with PO4 – All of the traffic associated with
state-controlled road which could be accommodated on the directs traffic generated by the development to the the development is directed to the local road network.
local road network. local road network.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state- AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are Not applicable – no road works are required.
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant designed and constructed in accordance with the
design standards. Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, extracted AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not Not Applicable
material or excavated spoil material exceeding 10,000 transported to or from the development site on a
tonnes per year does not damage the pavement of a state- state-controlled road.
controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport infrastructure
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact
Assessment, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017.
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the safety AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway Not Applicable
of a railway crossing. crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact assessment OR
be prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome. An impact on a level crossing may AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated. Not Applicable
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model
(ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section 2.2 – Not Applicable
Railway crossing safety of the Guide to Development in a OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to comply AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
with this performance outcome. constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual of
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
drawings.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 2 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Performance outcomes
it is recommended that an RPEQ certified traffic impact
assessment is provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
Acceptable outcomes
| Response
PO4 Development does not impose traffic loadings on a
state-controlled road which could be accommodated on the
local road network.
AO4.1 The layout and design of the development
directs traffic generated by the development to the
local road network.
Complies with PO4 — All of the traffic associated with
the development is directed to the local road network.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state-
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant
design standards.
AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are
designed and constructed in accordance with the
Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
Not applicable — no road works are required.
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, extracted
material or excavated spoil material exceeding 10,000
tonnes per year does not damage the pavement of a state-
controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport infrastructure
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact
Assessment, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017.
AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not
transported to or from the development site on a
state-controlled road.
Not Applicable
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the safety
of a railway crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact assessment
be prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model
(ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section 2.2 —
Railway crossing safety of the Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to comply
with this performance outcome.
AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway
crossing.
OR
Not Applicable
AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated.
Not Applicable
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 — Manual of
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
drawings.
Not Applicable
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 2 of 10
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment be
prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
acceptable outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment
Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section
2.2 – Railway crossing safety of the Guide to
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015,
provides guidance on how to comply with this
acceptable outcome
AND
AO7.4 Access points achieve sufficient clearance from Not Applicable
a level crossing in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual
of uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings by providing a minimum clearance of 5
metres from the edge running rail (outer rail) plus the
length of the largest vehicle anticipated on-site.
Note: Section 2.2 of the Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
AO7.5 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to give Not Applicable
priority to entering vehicles at all times.
PO8 Development does not result in a worsening of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
infrastructure condition of a railway or rail transport
infrastructure.
PO9 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
operating conditions of a railway
Stormwater and drainage
PO10 Development does not result in an actionable No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO10 – Stormwater from the proposed
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or development will have no impact upon the state
drainage impacts in a state transport corridor or state corridor or state transport infrastructure (refer
transport infrastructure. Engineering Report - Appendix D).
PO11 Run-off from the development site is not AO11.1 Development does not create any new Complies with PO11 – Refer above
points of discharge to a state transport corridor.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 3 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Pea COELI Le mel UL Corel}
Acceptable outcomes
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment be
prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
acceptable outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment
Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section
2.2 — Railway crossing safety of the Guide to
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015,
provides guidance on how to comply with this
acceptable outcome
AND
| Response
AO7.4 Access points achieve sufficient clearance from
a level crossing in accordance with AS1742.7 — Manual
of uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings by providing a minimum clearance of 5
metres from the edge running rail (outer rail) plus the
length of the largest vehicle anticipated on-site.
Note: Section 2.2 of the Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
Not Applicable
AO7.5 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to give
priority to entering vehicles at all times.
Not Applicable
PO8 Development does not result in a worsening of the
infrastructure condition of a railway or rail transport
infrastructure.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not Applicable
PO9 Development does not result in a worsening of
operating conditions of a railway
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not Applicable
Stormwater and drainage
PO10 Development does not result in an actionable
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or
drainage impacts in a state transport corridor or state
transport infrastructure.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO10 — Stormwater from the proposed
development will have no impact upon the state
corridor or state transport infrastructure (refer
Engineering Report - Appendix D).
PO11 Run-off from the development site is not
AOQ11.1 Development does not create any new
points of discharge to a state transport corridor.
Complies with PO11 — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 3 of 10
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
unlawfully discharged to a state transport corridor or AND
state transport infrastructure. AO11.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a lawful N/A – Refer above
point of discharge.
Note: Section 3.49 of the Queensland Urban
Drainage Manual,
Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia
(Queensland Division) Fourth Edition, 2016, provides
further information on lawful points of discharge.
AND
AO11.3 Development does not worsen the condition N/A – Refer above
of an existing lawful point of discharge to a state
transport corridor.
PO12 Run-off from the development site does not AO12.1 Run-off from the development site is not N/A – Refer above
cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure affecting a discharged to stormwater infrastructure for a state
state transport corridor or state transport transport corridor.
infrastructure.
Planned upgrades
PO13 Development does not impede delivery of AO13.1 Development is not located on land Complies PO13 – The proposed development will not
planned upgrades of state transport identified by the Department of Transport and Main affect planned upgrades of state transport
infrastructure. Roads as land required for the planned upgrade of infrastructure.
state transport infrastructure.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of state transport
infrastructure is identified in the DA mapping system.
OR
AO13.2 Development is sited and designed so that N/A – Refer above
permanent buildings, structures, infrastructure,
services or utilities are not located on land identified
by the Department of Transport and Main Roads as
land required for the planned upgrade of state
transport infrastructure.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply: N/A – Refer above
AO13.3 Structures and infrastructure located on
land identified by the Department of Transport and
Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of state transport infrastructure are able
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 4 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Performance outcomes
unlawfully discharged to a state transport corridor or
state transport infrastructure.
Acceptable outcomes
AND
| Response
AOQ11.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a lawful
point of discharge.
Note: Section 3.49 of the Queensland Urban
Drainage Manual,
Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia
(Queensland Division) Fourth Edition, 2016, provides
further information on lawful points of discharge.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AO11.3 Development does not worsen the condition
of an existing lawful point of discharge to a state
transport corridor.
N/A — Refer above
PO12 Run-off from the development site does not
cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure affecting a
state transport corridor or state transport
infrastructure.
AOQ12.1 Run-off from the development site is not
discharged to stormwater infrastructure for a state
transport corridor.
N/A — Refer above
Planned upgrades
PO13 Development does not impede delivery of
planned upgrades of state transport
infrastructure.
AO13.1 Development is not located on land
identified by the Department of Transport and Main
Roads as land required for the planned upgrade of
state transport infrastructure.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of state transport
infrastructure is identified in the DA mapping system.
OR
Complies PO13 — The proposed development will not
affect planned upgrades of state transport
infrastructure.
AO13.2 Development is sited and designed so that
permanent buildings, structures, infrastructure,
services or utilities are not located on land identified
by the Department of Transport and Main Roads as
land required for the planned upgrade of state
transport infrastructure.
N/A — Refer above
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO13.3 Structures and infrastructure located on
land identified by the Department of Transport and
Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of state transport infrastructure are able
N/A — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 4 of 10
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
to be readily relocated or removed without materially
affecting the viability or functionality of the
development.
AND
AO13.4 Vehicular access for the development is N/A – Refer above
consistent with the function and design of the
planned upgrade of state transport infrastructure.
AND
AO13.5 Development does not involve filling and N/A – Refer above
excavation of, or material changes to, land required
for a planned upgrade to a state transport
infrastructure.
AND
AO13.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the N/A – Refer above
predevelopment condition at the completion of the
use.
Table 6.2.3: Public passenger transport infrastructure
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Public passenger transport infrastructure
PO14 Development does not damage or interfere AO14.1 Vehicular access and associated road Complies with PO14 – The proposed development
with public passenger transport infrastructure, public access works are not located within 5 metres of will not have any impact upon public passenger
passenger services or pedestrian or cycle access to public passenger transport infrastructure. transport infrastructure passenger services or
public passenger transport infrastructure and public pedestrian or cycle access to public passenger
passenger services. AND transport infrastructure and public passenger services
(refer Appendix F).
AO14.2 Development does not necessitate the N/A – Refer above
relocation of existing public passenger transport
infrastructure.
AND
AO14.3 Development does not obstruct pedestrian N/A – Refer above
or cyclist access to public passenger transport
infrastructure or public passenger services.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 5 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Pea COELI Le mel UL Corel}
Acceptable outcomes
to be readily relocated or removed without materially
affecting the viability or functionality of the
development.
AND
| Response
AQ13.4 Vehicular access for the development is
consistent with the function and design of the
planned upgrade of state transport infrastructure.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AO13.5 Development does not involve filling and
excavation of, or material changes to, land required
for a planned upgrade to a state transport
infrastructure.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AO13.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the
predevelopment condition at the completion of the
use.
N/A — Refer above
Table 6.2.3: Public passenger transport infrastructure
eae Le mel el Coxe}
Public passenger transport infrastructure
Acceptable outcomes
| Response
PO14 Development does not damage or interfere
with public passenger transport infrastructure, public
passenger services or pedestrian or cycle access to
public passenger transport infrastructure and public
passenger services.
AQ14.1 Vehicular access and associated road
access works are not located within 5 metres of
public passenger transport infrastructure.
AND
Complies with PO14 — The proposed development
will not have any impact upon public passenger
transport infrastructure passenger services or
pedestrian or cycle access to public passenger
transport infrastructure and public passenger services
(refer Appendix F).
AO14.2 Development does not necessitate the
relocation of existing public passenger transport
infrastructure.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AOQ14.3 Development does not obstruct pedestrian
or cyclist access to public passenger transport
infrastructure or public passenger services.
AND
N/A — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 5 of 10
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO14.4 The normal operation of public passenger
transport infrastructure or public passenger services
is not interrupted during construction of the
development.
PO15 Upgraded or new public passenger No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A – Refer above
transport infrastructure is provided to
accommodate the demand for public passenger
transport generated by the development.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome,
it is recommended a public transport impact
assessment be
prepared in accordance with appendix 1 of the State
Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information –
Public Passenger Transport Infrastructure,
Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
New or upgraded public passenger transport
infrastructure
provided should be in accordance with the Public
Transport
Infrastructure Manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads,
2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
PO16 Development is designed to ensure the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A – Refer above
location of public passenger transport infrastructure
prioritises and enables efficient public passenger
services.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 6 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Pea COELI Le mel UL Corel}
Acceptable outcomes
AOQ14.4 The normal operation of public passenger
transport infrastructure or public passenger services
is not interrupted during construction of the
development.
| Response
PO15 Upgraded or new public passenger
transport infrastructure is provided to
accommodate the demand for public passenger
transport generated by the development.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome,
it is recommended a public transport impact
assessment be
prepared in accordance with appendix 1 of the State
Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information —
Public Passenger Transport Infrastructure,
Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
New or upgraded public passenger transport
infrastructure
provided should be in accordance with the Public
Transport
Infrastructure Manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads,
2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
N/A — Refer above
PO16 Development is designed to ensure the
location of public passenger transport infrastructure
prioritises and enables efficient public passenger
services.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
N/A — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 6 of 10
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: Chapters 2 and 5 of the Public Transport
Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2015 provides
guidance on how to comply with this performance
outcome.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
PO17 Development enables the provision or No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A – Refer above
extension of public passenger services to the
development and avoids creating indirect or inefficient
routes for public passenger services.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to
comply with the
performance outcome.
PO18 New or modified road networks are designed AO18.1 Roads catering for buses are arterial or N/A – Refer above
to enable development to be serviced by public sub-arterial roads, collector or their equivalent.
passenger services.
AND
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public AO18.2 Roads intended to accommodate buses are N/A – Refer above
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of designed and constructed in accordance with parts 3,
Transport and 4-4C and 6 of the Road Planning and Design Manual
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to 2nd edition, Volume 3: Guide to Road Design,
comply with the Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016 and
performance outcome. Part 13 of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 7 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Performance outcomes
Note: Chapters 2 and 5 of the Public Transport
Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2015 provides
guidance on how to comply with this performance
outcome.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
Acceptable outcomes
| Response
PO17 Development enables the provision or
extension of public passenger services to the
development and avoids creating indirect or inefficient
routes for public passenger services.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to
comply with the
performance outcome.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
N/A — Refer above
PO18 New or modified road networks are designed
to enable development to be serviced by public
passenger services.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to
comply with the
performance outcome.
AOQ18.1 Roads catering for buses are arterial or
sub-arterial roads, collector or their equivalent.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AO18.2 Roads intended to accommodate buses are
designed and constructed in accordance with parts 3,
4-4C and 6 of the Road Planning and Design Manual
2nd edition, Volume 3: Guide to Road Design,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016 and
Part 13 of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
N/A — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 7 of 10
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Devices, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2018.
Note: Parts 3, 4-4C and 6 of the Road Planning and
Design Manual, Volume 3: Guide to Road Design,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, must
be read in conjunction with the following standards
where specified in the Manual:
1. Supplement to Austroads Guide to Road Design
(Parts 3,4-4C and 6), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2014, and
2. Austroads Guide to Road Design (Parts 3,4-4C and
6).
AND
AO18.3 Traffic calming devices are not installed on N/A – Refer above
roads used for buses.
Note: Chapter 2 of the Public Transport Infrastructure
Manual,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015
provides
guidance on how to comply with this acceptable
outcome.
PO19 Development provides safe, direct and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO19 – The proposed development
convenient pedestrian access to existing and future will not impact upon the safe, direct, and convenient
public passenger transport infrastructure. pedestrian access to existing public passenger
transport infrastructure.
Note: Chapter 3 of the Public Transport Infrastructure
Manual,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015
provides
guidance on how to comply with this performance
outcome. In particular, it is recommended that a
pedestrian demand analysis be provided to
demonstrate compliance with the performance
outcome.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 8 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Pea COELI Le mel UL Corel}
Acceptable outcomes
Devices, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2018.
Note: Parts 3, 4-4C and 6 of the Road Planning and
Design Manual, Volume 3: Guide to Road Design,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, must
be read in conjunction with the following standards
where specified in the Manual:
1. Supplement to Austroads Guide to Road Design
(Parts 3,4-4C and 6), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2014, and
2. Austroads Guide to Road Design (Parts 3,4-4C and
6).
AND
| Response
AO18.3 Traffic calming devices are not installed on
roads used for buses.
Note: Chapter 2 of the Public Transport Infrastructure
Manual,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015
provides
guidance on how to comply with this acceptable
outcome.
N/A — Refer above
PO19 Development provides safe, direct and
convenient pedestrian access to existing and future
public passenger transport infrastructure.
Note: Chapter 3 of the Public Transport Infrastructure
Manual,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015
provides
guidance on how to comply with this performance
outcome. In particular, it is recommended that a
pedestrian demand analysis be provided to
demonstrate compliance with the performance
outcome.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO19 — The proposed development
will not impact upon the safe, direct, and convenient
pedestrian access to existing public passenger
transport infrastructure.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 8 of 10
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
PO20 On-site vehicular circulation ensures the AO20.1 The location of on-site pedestrian crossings N/A – Refer above
safety of both public passenger transport services ensures safe sight distances for pedestrians and
and pedestrians. public passenger services.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: AND
Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department AO20.2 On-site circulation is designed and N/A – Refer above
of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further constructed so that public passenger services can
guidance on how to comply with the performance enter and leave in a forward gear at all times.
outcome.
AND
AO20.3 Development does not result in public N/A – Refer above
passenger services movements through car parking
aisles.
PO21 Taxi facilities are provided to accommodate No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A – Refer above
the demand generated by the development.
Note: Guidance on how to meet the performance
outcome are
available in chapter 7 of the Public Transport
Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
PO22 Taxi facilities are located and designed to AO22.1 A taxi facility is provided parallel to the N/A – Refer above
provide convenient, safe and equitable access for kerb and adjacent to the main entrance.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 9 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Performance outcomes
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
Acceptable outcomes
| Response
PO20 On-site vehicular circulation ensures the
safety of both public passenger transport services
and pedestrians.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further
guidance on how to comply with the performance
outcome.
AQ20.1 The location of on-site pedestrian crossings
ensures safe sight distances for pedestrians and
public passenger services.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AQ20.2 On-site circulation is designed and
constructed so that public passenger services can
enter and leave in a forward gear at all times.
AND
N/A — Refer above
AQ20.3 Development does not result in public
passenger services movements through car parking
aisles.
N/A — Refer above
PO21 Taxi facilities are provided to accommodate
the demand generated by the development.
Note: Guidance on how to meet the performance
outcome are
available in chapter 7 of the Public Transport
Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public
passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply
with the
performance outcome.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
N/A — Refer above
PO22 Taxi facilities are located and designed to
provide convenient, safe and equitable access for
AOQ22.1 A taxi facility is provided parallel to the
kerb and adjacent to the main entrance.
N/A — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 9 of 10
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
passengers.
AND
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: AO22.2 Taxi facilities are designed in accordance N/A – Refer above
Public with:
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and 1. AS2890.5–1993 Parking facilities – on-street
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to parking and AS1428.1–2009 Design for access
comply with the and mobility – general requirements for access –
performance outcome. new building work
2. AS1742.11–1999 Parking controls – manual of
uniform traffic control devices
3. AS/NZS 2890.6–2009 Parking facilities – offstreet
parking for people with disabilities
4. Disability standards for accessible public
transport 2002 made under section 31(1) of the
Disability Discrimination Act 1992
5. AS/NZS 1158.3.1 – Lighting for roads and public
spaces, Part 3.1: Pedestrian area (category P)
lighting – Performance and design requirements.
PO23 Educational establishments are designed to AO23.1 Educational establishments are designed Not Applicable.
ensure the safe and efficient operation of public in accordance with the provisions of the Planning for
passenger services and pedestrian access. Safe Transport Infrastructure at Schools, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2011.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further
guidance on how to comply with the performance
outcome.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 10 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Performance outcomes
passengers.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to
comply with the
performance outcome.
Acceptable outcomes
AND
| Response
AQ22.2 Taxi facilities are designed in accordance
with:
1. AS2890.5-1993 Parking facilities — on-street
parking and AS1428.1—2009 Design for access
and mobility — general requirements for access —
new building work
2. AS1742.11-1999 Parking controls — manual of
uniform traffic control devices
3. AS/NZS 2890.6-2009 Parking facilities — offstreet
parking for people with disabilities
4. Disability standards for accessible public
transport 2002 made under section 31(1) of the
Disability Discrimination Act 1992
5. AS/NZS 1158.3.1 — Lighting for roads and public
spaces, Part 3.1: Pedestrian area (category P)
lighting — Performance and design requirements.
N/A — Refer above
PO23 Educational establishments are designed to
ensure the safe and efficient operation of public
passenger services and pedestrian access.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information:
Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further
guidance on how to comply with the performance
outcome.
AQ23.1 Educational establishments are designed
in accordance with the provisions of the Planning for
Safe Transport Infrastructure at Schools, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2011.
Not Applicable.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 10 of 10
Page 11
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala
habitat areas
Table 25.2.1 All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Retaining koala habitat areas
PO1 Development interfering with koala habitat (including No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO1 – The proposed development will have
interfering with koala habitat as a result of material change some impact on NJKHTs within the Core Koala Habitat
of use and interfering with koala habitat as a result of Area to the north of the development on the subject land;
reconfiguring a lot) does not occur unless the application however, the impact has been minimised as much as
demonstrates the interfering with koala habitat has: possible. The site is not designated a Koala Priority Area.
1. been reasonably avoided; or The impact upon the koala habitat on the site has been
2. been reasonably minimised where it cannot be considered by Gondwana Ecology in the Terrestrial Ecology
reasonably avoided; and Assessment provided as Appendix B. The proposed
3. mitigated the impacts of the interfering with koala development will result in the removal of 19 NJKHTs, for
habitat values. which an environmental offset is being provided.
Koala sensitive design and connectivity
PO2 The design and siting of development avoids No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO2 – Given the nature of the remanent
fragmenting koala habitat areas within the site. vegetation on the site, which is limited to an isolated and
disjointed pocket towards the north, the existing koala
habitat will not be further fragmented by the development
(refer Appendix B).
PO3 The design and siting of development does not result No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO3 – The proposed development will not
in impediments that restrict the movement of koalas by impede or restrict the movement of koalas through the site.
providing for safe koala movement between highly
connected patches of retained koala habitat area.
Koala safety from construction activities
PO4 The construction of the development does not AO4.1 A koala management plan is provided that includes: Complies with PO4 – A small number of NJKHTs are to be
increase the risk of injury or death of koalas. removed from within an isolated pocket of remanent
1. activities that may cause injury or death of koalas from vegetation. It is not expected that the construction of the
construction activities; and development will increase the risk of injury or death of
2. acceptable measures to avoid and mitigate injury or koalas. A koala spotter could be used at the time of tree
death of koalas from construction activities removal, which could be conditioned.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas Page 1 of 2
[OCR of page images]
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala
habitat areas
Table 25.2.1 All development
eae Le mel el Coxe}
Retaining koala habitat areas
Acceptable outcomes
| Response
PO1 Development interfering with koala habitat (including
interfering with koala habitat as a result of material change
of use and interfering with koala habitat as a result of
reconfiguring a lot) does not occur unless the application
demonstrates the interfering with koala habitat has:
1. been reasonably avoided; or
2. been reasonably minimised where it cannot be
reasonably avoided; and
3. mitigated the impacts of the interfering with koala
habitat values.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO1 — The proposed development will have
some impact on NUKHTs within the Core Koala Habitat
Area to the north of the development on the subject land;
however, the impact has been minimised as much as
possible. The site is not designated a Koala Priority Area.
The impact upon the koala habitat on the site has been
considered by Gondwana Ecology in the Terrestrial Ecology
Assessment provided as Appendix B. The proposed
development will result in the removal of 19 NJUKHTs, for
which an environmental offset is being provided.
Koala sensitive design and connectivity
PO2 The design and siting of development avoids
fragmenting koala habitat areas within the site.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO2 — Given the nature of the remanent
vegetation on the site, which is limited to an isolated and
disjointed pocket towards the north, the existing koala
habitat will not be further fragmented by the development
(refer Appendix B).
PO3 The design and siting of development does not result
in impediments that restrict the movement of koalas by
providing for safe koala movement between highly
connected patches of retained koala habitat area.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO3 — The proposed development will not
impede or restrict the movement of koalas through the site.
Koala safety from construction activities
PO4 The construction of the development does not
increase the risk of injury or death of koalas.
AO4.1 A koala management plan is provided that includes:
1. activities that may cause injury or death of koalas from
construction activities; and
2. acceptable measures to avoid and mitigate injury or
death of koalas from construction activities
Complies with PO4 — A small number of NJKHTs are to be
removed from within an isolated pocket of remanent
vegetation. It is not expected that the construction of the
development will increase the risk of injury or death of
koalas. A koala spotter could be used at the time of tree
removal, which could be conditioned.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas
Page 1 of 2
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome, a koala
management plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced
person.
AND
AO4.2 Interfering with koala habitat complies with the
sequential clearing and koala spotter requirements under
section 10 and 11 of the Nature Conservation (Koala)
Conservation Plan 2017.
Matters of State Environmental Significance
PO5 Development: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO5 – The proposed development will result
in the removal of 19 NJKHTs from the site, for which an
1. avoids impacts on matters of state environmental environmental offset is to be provided. The proposed
significance; or development will minimise and mitigate matters of state
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters of state environmental significance which cannot be reasonably
environmental significance after demonstrating avoided (refer Appendix B). There are no other matters of
avoidance is not reasonably possible; and state environmental significance on the subject land.
3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all reasonable
avoidance, minimisation and mitigation measures are
undertaken, the development results in an acceptable
significant residual impact on a matter of state
environmental significance that is a prescribed
environmental matter.
Note: Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
impact on koala habitat areas is provided in Chapter 2A of the Queensland
Environmental Offsets Policy.
Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
impact on all other matters of state environmental significance is provided in
the Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department of State Development,
Infrastructure and Planning, 2014.
Category C and R vegetation
PO6 Development: No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
1. avoids impacts on category C areas of vegetation and
category R areas of vegetation; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category C areas
of vegetation and category R areas of vegetation after
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably possible.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas Page 2 of 2
[OCR of page images]
formance outcomes
Acceptable outcomes
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome, a koala
management plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced
person.
AND
AO4.2 Interfering with koala habitat complies with the
sequential clearing and koala spotter requirements under
section 10 and 11 of the Nature Conservation (Koala)
Conservation Plan 2017.
Matters of State Environmental Significance
POS Development:
1. avoids impacts on matters of state environmental
significance; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters of state
environmental significance after demonstrating
avoidance is not reasonably possible; and
3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all reasonable
avoidance, minimisation and mitigation measures are
undertaken, the development results in an acceptable
significant residual impact on a matter of state
environmental significance that is a prescribed
environmental matter.
Note: Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
impact on koala habitat areas is provided in Chapter 2A of the Queensland
Environmental Offsets Policy.
Guidance for determining if development will have a significant residual
impact on all other matters of state environmental significance is provided in
the Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department of State Development,
Infrastructure and Planning, 2014.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with POS — The proposed development will result
in the removal of 19 NJKHTs from the site, for which an
environmental offset is to be provided. The proposed
development will minimise and mitigate matters of state
environmental significance which cannot be reasonably
avoided (refer Appendix B). There are no other matters of
state environmental significance on the subject land.
Category C and R vegetation
PO6 Development:
1. avoids impacts on category C areas of vegetation and
category R areas of vegetation; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category C areas
of vegetation and category R areas of vegetation after
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably possible.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas
Page 2 of 2