Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
it is recommended that an RPEQ certified traffic impact
assessment is provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO4 Development does not impose traffic loadings on a AO4.1 The layout and design of the development Complies with PO4 – All of the traffic associated with
state-controlled road which could be accommodated on the directs traffic generated by the development to the the development is directed to the local road network.
local road network. local road network.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state- AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are Not applicable – no road works are required.
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant designed and constructed in accordance with the
design standards. Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, extracted AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not Not Applicable
material or excavated spoil material exceeding 10,000 transported to or from the development site on a
tonnes per year does not damage the pavement of a state- state-controlled road.
controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport infrastructure
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact
Assessment, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017.
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the safety AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway Not Applicable
of a railway crossing. crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact assessment OR
be prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome. An impact on a level crossing may AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated. Not Applicable
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model
(ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section 2.2 – Not Applicable
Railway crossing safety of the Guide to Development in a OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to comply AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
with this performance outcome. constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual of
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
drawings.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 2 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Performance outcomes
it is recommended that an RPEQ certified traffic impact
assessment is provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
Acceptable outcomes
| Response
PO4 Development does not impose traffic loadings on a
state-controlled road which could be accommodated on the
local road network.
AO4.1 The layout and design of the development
directs traffic generated by the development to the
local road network.
Complies with PO4 — All of the traffic associated with
the development is directed to the local road network.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state-
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant
design standards.
AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are
designed and constructed in accordance with the
Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
Not applicable — no road works are required.
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, extracted
material or excavated spoil material exceeding 10,000
tonnes per year does not damage the pavement of a state-
controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport infrastructure
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact
Assessment, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017.
AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not
transported to or from the development site on a
state-controlled road.
Not Applicable
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the safety
of a railway crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact assessment
be prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model
(ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section 2.2 —
Railway crossing safety of the Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to comply
with this performance outcome.
AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway
crossing.
OR
Not Applicable
AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated.
Not Applicable
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 — Manual of
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
drawings.
Not Applicable
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 2 of 10
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.