Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Table 6.2.2: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Network impacts
PO1 Development does not result in a worsening of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO1 - The Traffic Engineering
safety of a state-controlled road. Assessment prepared by Traffic and Transport Plus
(refer Appendix F) has confirmed that the additional
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance traffic generated (associated with the proposed hotel)
outcome, it is recommended that a Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified road safety audit
would be significantly less than 5% of the Base Traffic
or road safety assessment (as applicable) is provided. Volumes on the approaches to the roundabout in
2023 (the opening year of the site).
Further information on determining whether a road safety
audit or road safety assessment is required is provided in The additional traffic expected to be generated by the
section 9 of the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, proposed development will have a negligible impact
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017. on the operation of the Leslie Drive / Cooyar Street /
Tarina Street / Noosa Springs Drive roundabout
intersection, and surrounding road network, which will
continue to operate well within acceptable capacity
thresholds.
PO2 Development does not result in a worsening of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO2 – Given the advice provided
infrastructure condition of a state-controlled road or road above, the proposed development will not have a
transport infrastructure. measurable impact upon the state-controlled or road
transport infrastructure.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified traffic
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment and pavement impact assessment is provided
in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO3 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO3 – The advice provided above,
operating conditions on a state-controlled road or the proposed development will not result in a worsening
surrounding road network. of operating conditions on a state-controlled road or
the surrounding road network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome,
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 1 of 10
[OCR of page images]
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Table 6.2.2: All develooment
eae Le mel el Coxe} Acceptable outcomes
Network impacts
cos
PO1 Development does not result in a worsening of the
safety of a state-controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that a Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) certified road safety audit
or road safety assessment (as applicable) is provided.
Further information on determining whether a road safety
audit or road safety assessment is required is provided in
section 9 of the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO1 - The Traffic Engineering
Assessment prepared by Traffic and Transport Plus
(refer Appendix F) has confirmed that the additional
traffic generated (associated with the proposed hotel)
would be significantly less than 5% of the Base Traffic
Volumes on the approaches to the roundabout in
2023 (the opening year of the site).
The additional traffic expected to be generated by the
proposed development will have a negligible impact
on the operation of the Leslie Drive / Cooyar Street /
Tarina Street / Noosa Springs Drive roundabout
intersection, and surrounding road network, which will
continue to operate well within acceptable capacity
thresholds.
PO2 Development does not result in a worsening of the
infrastructure condition of a state-controlled road or road
transport infrastructure.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified traffic
impact assessment and pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact
assessment and pavement impact assessment is provided
in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO2 — Given the advice provided
above, the proposed development will not have a
measurable impact upon the state-controlled or road
transport infrastructure.
PO3 Development does not result in a worsening of
operating conditions on a state-controlled road or the
surrounding road network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome,
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO3 — The advice provided above,
proposed development will not result in a worsening
of operating conditions on a state-controlled road or
the surrounding road network.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 1 of 10
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.