Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment be
prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
acceptable outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment
Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section
2.2 – Railway crossing safety of the Guide to
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015,
provides guidance on how to comply with this
acceptable outcome
AND
AO7.4 Access points achieve sufficient clearance from Not Applicable
a level crossing in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual
of uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings by providing a minimum clearance of 5
metres from the edge running rail (outer rail) plus the
length of the largest vehicle anticipated on-site.
Note: Section 2.2 of the Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
AO7.5 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to give Not Applicable
priority to entering vehicles at all times.
PO8 Development does not result in a worsening of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
infrastructure condition of a railway or rail transport
infrastructure.
PO9 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
operating conditions of a railway
Stormwater and drainage
PO10 Development does not result in an actionable No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO10 – Stormwater from the proposed
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or development will have no impact upon the state
drainage impacts in a state transport corridor or state corridor or state transport infrastructure (refer
transport infrastructure. Engineering Report - Appendix D).
PO11 Run-off from the development site is not AO11.1 Development does not create any new Complies with PO11 – Refer above
points of discharge to a state transport corridor.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 3 of 10
[OCR of page images]
Pea COELI Le mel UL Corel}
Acceptable outcomes
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment be
prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
acceptable outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment
Model (ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section
2.2 — Railway crossing safety of the Guide to
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015,
provides guidance on how to comply with this
acceptable outcome
AND
| Response
AO7.4 Access points achieve sufficient clearance from
a level crossing in accordance with AS1742.7 — Manual
of uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings by providing a minimum clearance of 5
metres from the edge running rail (outer rail) plus the
length of the largest vehicle anticipated on-site.
Note: Section 2.2 of the Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment: Rail, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
Not Applicable
AO7.5 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to give
priority to entering vehicles at all times.
Not Applicable
PO8 Development does not result in a worsening of the
infrastructure condition of a railway or rail transport
infrastructure.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not Applicable
PO9 Development does not result in a worsening of
operating conditions of a railway
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not Applicable
Stormwater and drainage
PO10 Development does not result in an actionable
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or
drainage impacts in a state transport corridor or state
transport infrastructure.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies with PO10 — Stormwater from the proposed
development will have no impact upon the state
corridor or state transport infrastructure (refer
Engineering Report - Appendix D).
PO11 Run-off from the development site is not
AOQ11.1 Development does not create any new
points of discharge to a state transport corridor.
Complies with PO11 — Refer above
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Page 3 of 10
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 3 - State Development Assessment Provisions.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.