07/1173 - Operational Works - Transport Type 6 - Refurbishment of Boathouse & Jetty [As Published] · 142007.1173

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 (IPA)

Part P, Version 1.1, 27 March 2006

Form 1 Development Application

 

Prescribed tidal work

 

Completion of all applicable questions on Part P is mandatory for all applications involving assessment against the Prescribed Tidal Work Code contained in the
Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003 tor operational work that is prescribed tidal work within a focal government tidal area.
For further information refer to Guide 24 Prescribed tidal work, and the Guideline for making an application for prescribed tidal work on the EPA Website.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nature of the application 1. This application is for operational work for the following prescribed tidal work, carried out
Tidal work is defined in the schedule to the completely or partly within a local government tidal area: (tick one (1) or more applicable boxes)
Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995. Sy . .
5 .
All tidal works, completely or partly within a local i) jetty, pier or wharf,
government tidal area, other than Udal works C1 (i) boat ramp or slipway;
mentioned below, are prescribed tidal work. Oo (i) mooring pile:
The following tidal works are not prescribed tidal 9 pile;
work: (1 (iy) | deck or boardwalk;
) tidal works for a new or existing structure that Oo (v) pontoon;
Is used for the operation of any of the , .
following— (vi) _ revetment, sea wall or retaining wall;
a port authority;
i pubic hoy. facility constructed by or RK (vii) other (e.g. abutment, basin, bridge, breakwater, dam, dock, dockyard, embankment, groyne, pipeline or
for Queensland Transport or a port other underground service efc) - provide details below.
authority; 7 T
b) tidal works for any of the folowing — | refurbishment of existing boat house
0) eating or changing the ceumiguration 2. This application is for prescribed tidal work, that is for:
vara ics of a navigational channel; . .
(ji) an inlet of outlet for aquaculture carried (i) private purposes; or
out on land if the aquacufture is made . ,
setfassessable under the tocal (1 (i) _ other than private purposes.
govemment's planning scheme. . .
Part M should be completed for applications for 3. Estimated value of the completed works:
tidal work that is not prescribed tidal work, | < $10 000
The fee for works may depend on the type of
work, £.g. For works other than a private
purpose, EPA's concurrence fee ts calculated in
terms of the vaiue of the completed works.
Local government tidal area 4. The local government tidal area in which the works are proposed is: (e.g. Caims, Gold Coast, Mackay)
tahoe tO othe nerfed Pamng Act 1997 |_| Noosa Shire
(IPA).
Access to adjoining properties 5. _ {s the application supported by evidence that the proposed works will not prejudice the access
Evidence may include tha support of the rights of adjoining property owners?
adjoining property owner for the proposal and a NO
water allocation area illustrated on the plans, ~
Refer to the Guideline for preparing a water (YES - attach evidence
allocation area on the EPA Website.
Navigational safety 6. _ {s the application within a cul-de-sac or a bend in a waterway or other location where the side
Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) and the boundaries of the lot connected to the work and neighbouring lots are not at right angles to the
assessment manager require information on, waterway?
neighbouring structures to ensure the proposal
does not impact on navigational safety or the KINO
law right of to and from abutti . . .
vatertant properties. Appications may not be (11 YES - attach photographs of, or spprovel information for constructed or unconstructed neighbouring structures
approved if they interfere with access rights of
abutting waterfront properties or with navigation
in the waterway.
Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) ]7.

response

A pre-application concurrence response from
MSQ can only be provided on applicant request.
Note: A pre-application concurrence agency
response is of no effect if an appication triggers
referral coordination.

 

Is the application supported by a pre-application concurrence agency response from the chief
executive under the Transport Operations (Maritime Safety) Act 1994?

NO
(2 YES - attach response