Original source · versioned page text
Traffic Management Plan_IMS-04-05_D (001) FOR APPROVAL
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Traffic Management Plan
17. Appendix 7 - Traffic Management Options Considered
Below is a sample of the traffic management options to be considered.
Option Features Comment
Vehicle Traffic Sidetrack Construct a side-track full width to allow two lanes of Not Adopted
around the worksite traffic past the works and not affect the construction.
Disadvantages:
▪ Not practical as cost of construction and timeframe
are not feasible.
▪ It would take months to construct and remove a side-
track which would delay the works program.
▪ Two bridges along section of works which require
additional detour works through creeks.
Advantages:
▪ This will allow access to unimpeded access to the
work area for resealing works to be completed.
▪ Less delays for road users.
▪ Positive customer experience.
Detour Close Lake Macdonald Drive and detour all through traffic Not Practical. But
around will be utilised for
Emergency /
Disadvantages: Alternative Route
▪ This detour would add an additional excess km of for road users
travel to road users.
▪ Would still have to allow for full traffic management to
deal with local traffic.
▪ Harvest time would create additional traffic on road to
deal with.
Advantages:
▪ Would remove most road users from the road and
minimise traffic interaction with construction.
▪ Allow smoother construction of the sealing works.
Contraflow Not possible as road is not a multi lane road. Not Adopted
Traffic through the Allow road users to traverse through the works, but only possible after Not Adopted
worksite placement of initial rolling of stone.
Disadvantages:
▪ Higher risk of incident or collision.
▪ Higher risk of injury to workers and road users.
▪ Possible stone chips to vehicles due to accessing the sealing works
to early.
▪ Possibly reduced customer satisfaction.
▪ Possibly require pilot vehicle.
IMS-04-05_D - Reviewed May 2019 Document Uncontrolled When Printed Page 28 of 30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.