Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

2022-08-18 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

of 55

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA   18 AUGUST 2022




                            Page 53 of 55

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                               18 AUGUST 2022

                                           The respondent has not taken the full opportunity to represent
                          Poor             themselves as well as others in this process. The application
                                           demonstrates:

                                  .        e   Little or no knowledge and expertise in the subject matter.
                      Attracts 5 points    e   Lengthy answers, and lack of clarity as to where value might be
                                               found.
                                           e   Nocurrent, recent or older examples that demonstrate alignment to
                                               the subject matter.
                                           e   Specialist knowledge is in non-related subject matter but unable to
                                               articulate where this expertise or background adds value to the
                                               process.
                                           e   Little or no formal qualifications, employment history or relevant
                                               experiences that demonstrate where value to the process might be
                                               found.
                                           e   Offers no compelling argument or sound rationale as to where this
                                               EOI adds value to the process.
                                           e   The respondent appears to be pushing an agenda that could be
                                               detrimental to this process.
                                           e   A “well-managed and sustainable destination for future generations”
                                               is not (or rarely) mentioned.
                                           e   Language used is more negative, exclusive, entitled and/or
                                               combative in tone.

                  Evaluation Process

                  1.  You will be supplied with access to all completed Expressions of Interest, following the close of
                      the formal process (midnight on Friday 5 August 2022) and on receipt of a signed Probity
                      Form.

                  Phase 1 — Independent Evaluation
                  2.  Choose 1 of three scores for each of the five questions

                      -   20 points denote a strong, well-articulated answer
                      -   10 points denote a good answer, but perhaps not as strong as others
                      -   5 points denote an answer that is not as well articulated as other applicants
                      -   20 points denotes no conflict of interest, O points if there is a conflict of interest

                  3.  Prompts above can be used as a guide to how each question might be scored

                  4.  Each panel member assesses all EOI’s and scores them independent of other panel members

                  5|Page
                                                eu EN@eseaceloners

                                                                                                           Page 53 of 55
Log in to download the original file

2022-08-18 Ordinary Meeting Agenda(PDF, 4MB).pdf · 4.7 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.