Original source · versioned page text
ADAMS+SPARKES Town Planning Report
Attached to the e-mail Multiple Housing Type 2 Duplex & Operational Works - IDAS Forms, Cover letter & Report - MCU17/0076 & OPW17/0224.
The original of this document is very large (13.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Material Change of Use and Operational Works to Establish Multiple Housing (Type 2 Duplex) 13 25 Edward Street, Noosaville 4.3.2 Flood Hazard Area SPP 36. The proposed development does not compromise the Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience for a Flood Hazard Area, outlined within the SPP. This is due to the development mitigating flood risk, by the development being located above the 1% AEP event, without the need for filling. 37. The development does not result in direct or indirect impacts, increases the severity of flood hazard on the site or adjoining properties and does not burden the disaster management response or recovery capacity and capabilities. As such, no further assessment of the Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience section of the SPP is required. 4.4 State Interests (SARA) 38. Following amendments to the SPA on 1 July 2013, the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) came into effect and replaced the various State referral agencies, which previously applied. As a result, the purpose of SARA is to provide a single agency lodgement and assessment point for development applications, where the State has an interest under Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulations (SPR) 2009. 39. A review of the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning (DILGP) mapping has indicated that the subject sites is impacted by the following layers: • Water Resources - Water Resource Planning Area Boundary • Coastal Protection - Coastal Zone - Coastal Hazard Area – Medium Storm Tide Inundation Area 4.4.1 Water Resources 40. A review of the development in relation to Water Resources (Water Resource Planning Area Boundary) has been undertaken against Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, which has confirmed that this trigger does not require the application to be referred to SARA. 4.4.2 Coastal Protection 41. A review of the development in relation to Coastal Protection (Coastal Zone and Coastal Hazard Area) has been undertaken against Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, which has confirmed that this trigger does not require the application to be referred to SARA. 4.4.3 Heritage 42. A search of the Queensland Heritage Place Register on 6 June 2017 confirms that the subject site is not listed as a heritage place or located adjacent to a heritage listed place, and therefore the proposed development does not trigger assessment of heritage by the State. 4.4.4 Unexploded Ordnance The subject site is listed on Register as having ‘Other’ UXO potential (as searched 6 June 2017). Under Schedule 7, Table 3, Item 11 of the SPR 2009, a Material Change of use of premises if all or part of the premises are in an area for which a UXO management advice has been given requires referral to SARA. Project No – 170414
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.