Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

EASTERN BEACHES FORESHORE RESERVES MANAGEMENT PLAN - COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OVERVIEW AND PROPOSED CHANGES · Attachment 3 EBFRMP Engagement Analysis Articulous

of 48

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
 Infrastructure            "Scope, budget and implement the installation of grates or system that sieve all water before discharge into the ocean or
                           creeks."

                           "Local streets/roads need better curb and guttering, and much improved stormwater channeling/runoff, away from the
                           foreshores."
 Assessment                "Include regular evaluation of the efficacy of actual implementation actions so they can be modified if ineffective
                           quickly."

                           “Encourage all local residents to monitor the storm water drains in the nearby inland streets to the west of the ocean -
                           often the grids are covered by old newspapers and junk mail that residents don't pick up."
 Creek erosion             "Investigate stormwater outfalls for potential to produce landslips or rapid erosion e.g. Sunrise Beach incidents."

                           "Burgess Creek gets all the attention, but each of the creeks that enter the beach area are a cause of erosion during
                           storm events. At beach access 27, the storm water caused enormous erosion last year and the beach had to be rebuilt by
                           bulldozer. Storm water in the creeks are a bigger source of erosion than anything else mentioned in this review."
 General                   "Some of these principles are not within council responsibilities eg managing river mouth alignment."

                           "This should be action number one. Without this nothing else really works."


7.14. Action area 10: Foreshore tenure and gazettal
Respondents were asked to provide a written response on whether there was anything missing or overlooked in the proposed actions for
foreshore tenure and gazettal.

Of the 204 people who took part in the survey, 27 provided a response to this question (13.2%).

   •   9 (33.3%) of these responses related to the foreshore tenure and gazettal action area, and 18 related to other action areas
Log in to download the original file

Attachment 3 EBFRMP Engagement Analysis Articulous.pdf · 584 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.