Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-16 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 16 JUNE 2021
Submission Topic Detail
Submission 30:
I strongly object to proposed changes to the Tourism Levy, as outlined in draft Budget
papers, and disagree with the statement that "Tourism promotion has evolved into core
Council business". Tourism promotion has sat with Tourism Noosa for 20 years, an
organisation that professionally, transparently and strategically promotes the
destination, with great success. Our increasing visitor spend (reaching a record $1.2
billion in the months before Covid) and the recent Queensland's Top Tourism Town
Award (Tourism Noosa's submission) are 2 recent examples. I urge you to maintain
the current Tourism Levy structure and continue to fund Tourism Noosa's operations
well into the future.
Submission 31:
I strongly object to proposed changes to the Tourism Levy, as outlined in draft Budget
papers, and disagree with the statement that "Tourism promotion has evolved into core
Council business". Tourism promotion has sat with Tourism Noosa for 20 years, an
organisation that professionally, transparently and strategically promotes the
destination, with great success. Our increasing visitor spend (reaching a record $1.2
billion in the months before Covid) and the recent Queensland's Top Tourism Town
Award (Tourism Noosa's submission) are 2 recent examples. I urge you to maintain
the current Tourism Levy structure and continue to fund Tourism Noosa's operations
well into the future.
Submission 32:
The Council collects a Tourism and Economic Levy from applicable rate payers
(tourism and commercial businesses, short stay homes and now Air BnBs) and pays
Tourism Noosa the set amount of $2.52M, not including the annual charge of a fee of
$80,000 for collection and distribution to Tourism Noosa. Toward the end of this year,
Tourism Noosa will be working with Council to negotiate a new contract for Tourism
Noosa to continue its operations in 2022 and beyond.
I/We whole heartly disagree with the section under KEY DRAFT BUDGET
COMPONENTS 1. Rates and charges. ‘Tourism and economic development activities
are now considered core Council business and are proposed to be funded by general
rates (to be applied only to those properties that are currently paying the Tourism and
Economic Levy).’ This statement provides a fundamental change to the transparency
and protection of how Noosa Council accounts for rate payers' Tourism Levy funds,
and if they are being used in the best interest of tourism and the economy, businesses
and community in Noosa. Council is requested to provide the Noosa community with
complete transparency and answers on:
1. The exact breakdown of the total funds being collected from Tourism and Economic
Levy rate payers, and how Council plans to allocate that funding outside the $2.5M for
Tourism Noosa.
2. Why is it suddenly now that Noosa Council deems tourism as a core responsibility
when it hasn’t before?
3. Will Noosa Council publish achievements from the economic development allocation
of funds – similar to an annual report for those that contribute to the fund?
4. Is Noosa Council planning to reduce funding to Tourism Noosa over the next 5
years?
5. Do Noosa Councillors understand the impact to our economy from the visitor
economy? If so – why is there not more support for businesses and industry around
tourism?
FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL RESPONSE:
6. Can Noosa Council elaborate more on the new allocation of $150,000 to ‘destination
management’ that has been allocated but not included in the budget consultation
process? Is destination management not the core role of a Council and should have
been a focus previously?
7. The economy of Noosa is critical to families and business. Why has Noosa Council
now removed the requirement for ‘new to region’ retirees to pay 3 years of full rates
before a discount is applied – essentially enabling immediate discounts to new
residents that do not contribute to economic activity in the region.
Page 34 of 47
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.