Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Assessment Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (10.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
4. allow space for required and Holts Road boundary. Land in an industry
vehicle parking; zone is typically afforded the
5. preserve any existing Other boundaries— opportunity for built-to-boundary
vegetation that will buffer walls.
1. 0.0 metres to boundaries
the proposed building;
that adjoin land in an The proposal is considered to
6. allow for landscaping industry zone;
between buildings and respond appropriately, and
2. 10 metres to boundaries proposes landscaping within the
within frontages to soften
adjoining a residential zone; site frontage to soften the built
buildings, car parking,
infrastructure and services; 3. 10 metres to boundaries form.
that adjoin Walter Hay
7. maintain the visual To the west, the site abuts land
Drive, Eumundi Noosa Road
continuity and pattern of zoned for environmental
and/or Eenie Creek Road;
buildings and landscape management and conservation. To
and 3 metres to any other
elements within the street; the east, the site abuts land zoned
boundary.
8. avoid large areas of for low impact industry. An access
continuous wall planes by driveway is provided along the
varying the building adjoining boundary on this lot.
setbacks and using
appropriate techniques to This results in the proposal
provide visual relief; providing a myriad of benefits,
9. not visually dominate the including sufficient separation to
street or surrounding buildings on adjoining lots, and
spaces access to sunlight, views and
10. avoid development within ventilation. The extensive
the Holts Road setback setbacks to adjoining existing and
future buildings offsets any
potential visual and acoustic
amenity impacts.
As demonstrated in section 3.3 of
the report, the proposal provides
surplus onsite parking to cater for
the anticipated demand of the
proposed development.
The proposal is considered to
maintain the visual continuity of
the street. Of particular note is
the adjoining development to the
west, which provides a minimum
road setback of 4.5m. Varying
setbacks are provided to respond
to the shape of the frontage and
provide visual interest, with a
minimum setback of 6m
proposed. The proposal is
considered compliant with PO14.
Landscaping AO23.1 Landscaping is provided The proposal is partially compliant
PO23 Landscaping is designed, to a minimum of 15% of the with AO23.1, providing 27% of
planted and maintained in site, of which, a minimum of landscaping, where 15% is
accordance with Councils 60% is forward of the building required. The proposal does not
Planning Scheme Policy PSP2 line and visible from the street. propose 60% of landscaping
Landscaping and: forward of the building line,
however does provide a sufficient
1. provides planting in AO23.2 Landscaping is provided
13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.