Original source · versioned page text
2021-04-06 Planning & Environment Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 APRIL 2021
Matters Raised Comments
Vegetation Clearing & Habitat Destruction The applicant has sought to retain as many trees as
Residents have concerns for destruction of habitat possible on the site in an effort to maintain visual
for several fauna species and the detrimental amenity, provide mature landscaping and a natural
impact of neighbouring amenity that would result setting for the residents to enjoy. The existing
from removal of trees on the site to accommodate vegetation is not remnant vegetation and is not
the proposal. mapped as having significant biodiversity
significance.
Stormwater runoff Council’s Development Engineer has indicated that
Concerns have been raised about the potential for the proposed stormwater solution has the capacity
increased runoff making existing stormwater to achieve non-worsening.
conditions worse.
Smoking Smoking and smoke drift is not an issue that the
Smoke drift from smokers in the nearby residential planning scheme can regulate.
care facility is raised as a concern by residents in a
non-smoking residential complex.
Safety The proposed development is subject to strict
Uneven pathways, absence of pathway on the safety compliance required for disability housing.
same side of the street as the proposed It is considered unreasonable to require a footpath
development, dangerous traffic conditions and in front of the site on the southern side of Viewland
steep hills have all been raised as matters which Drive when there is no footpath on the remainder of
have the potential to adversely affect the future that side of the street.
residents of the facility. Most residents are unlikely to be pedestrian.
Lighting Lighting is proposed to maintain compliance with
Illuminated signs, exits, pathways and parking bays safety and emergency requirements. Appropriate
have been identified by submitters as having conditions can be imposed to minimise glare or
significant adverse effects. disturbance.
Privacy The finished floor level is estimated to be similar to
Loss of privacy is raised as an issue with the that of the neighbouring property to the west.
proposed residential care facility being located near Landscaping is proposed between the proposed
existing residential dwellings. Submitters maintain buildings and site boundaries. The possibility of
that direct overlooking will result into their pool and overlooking is minor, but would be confined to
outdoor recreation areas, bathrooms, bedrooms overlooking from within the proposed buildings.
and living areas and that enforcement of privacy Appropriate conditions can address any perceived
and noise issues are weak and ineffectual. or actual overlooking issues.
Sunlight (overshadowing) No significant overshadowing will result from the
Submitters are concerned that the two storey proposal.
component of the building will result in
overshadowing of neighbouring premises resulting
in loss of sunlight to adjacent residences.
Setbacks The setbacks to side and rear boundaries are
Nearby residents are concerned that the proposed compliant with code requirements with the
building will be built too close to the boundary. exception of a small section where a wardrobe
extends within the setback area on the southern
boundary. This has negligible adverse amenity
implications on neighbouring properties. The front
setbacks to the wall are 6 metres and only the roof
overhang encroaches, bringing the outermost
projection to similar setback to other existing
buildings in the street.
Page 23 of 52
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.