ASTP-Rspns_To_RFI

            ITEM 7:
            The proposed landscape planters, the proposed scooter parking and the building supports
            appear to impact on the ability of vehicles to enter and exit the existing and proposed spaces.

            Provide a plan with the swept paths of vehicles entering and exiting the existing and
            proposed car spaces. The plans must be prepared by or endorsed by a suitably qualified
            person (RPEQ) and include but not be limited to:
                  •   dimensions of all spaces and aisles including the aisle width at the scooter spaces
                      opposite the roller door to the “industry” area
                  •   swept paths for a B99 vehicle as described in AS/NZS2890.1:2004
                  •   the swept paths must assume that the adjoining space is occupied
                  •   sufficient detail to demonstrate that vehicles can enter the site and space in a
                      forward gear, manoeuvre on site and exit the site in a forward gear in a total of 3
                      movements.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the revised Car Parking Assessment prepared by Rytenskild in Attachment 2, which provides the
required vehicle turn paths on pages 13-18 for Council’s assessment. A written response to item 7 is also
provided on page 5 of Attachment 2.



            ITEM 8:
            Council has concerns with the width of the access driveway to the site and it’s capacity to cater for the
            increase in traffic movements due to the proposed use. The access does not appear to provide
            sufficient width for vehicles to pass and Council has concerns that vehicles entering the site will have
            to stop or hold on Rene Street to allow a vehicle to exit the site.

            Provide comment from a suitably qualified person (RPEQ) that addresses Council concerns and includes
            recommendations for any necessary works (widening, signage etc).

RESPONSE
Please refer to the revised Car Parking Assessment prepared by Rytenskild in Attachment 2, which provides a
written response to the above item on pages 5 and 6.




Our ref: 220609                                                                                               Page 3 of 4