ASTP-Rspns_To_RFI

patrons permitted on site at any one time has been reduced to only 40 persons. Providing capacity on the site
for a maximum of 40 persons will ensure that the Bar will remain ancillary to the to the distillery operations
currently operating on site, which occupies 169m2 of the tenancy.



            ITEM 4:
            The planning report and traffic report do not fully align with respect to the maximum
            number of patrons that may utilise the site. The planning report details that up to 60 persons
            may be accommodated whereas the traffic report details up to 20 persons. The planning
            report also contends that there is an excess of motorcycle parking however the traffic report
            has not demonstrated that these spaces are viable.

            It is noted that the proposal is four (4) carparking spaces short with the report detailing that
            the surrounding roads can accommodate the excess carparking.

            Provide further clarification about carparking and the proposed numbers of patrons that will
            utilise the site.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the revised Car Parking Assessment prepared by Rytenskild in Attachment 2, which details that
the site may accommodate up to 40 patrons onsite at any given time. The Car Parking Assessment justifies the
car parking allowance, based on the revised proposal for 40 patrons, on page 11 of Attachment 2.



            ITEM 5:
            Provide a plan that demonstrates the location of bicycle spaces on site.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the revised Building Design Plans prepared by Collins Building Designs in Attachment 1, which
includes the allocation of bicycle parking onsite. The proposal has allowed for four (4) bicycle parking spaces
onsite, with two (2) steel hoops provided.



            ITEM 6:
            The planning report and proposal plans indicate that the proposal does not comply with
            current landscape requirements. It is suggested that additional dense planting along the
            frontage of the site would assist in meeting the Performance outcomes.

            Amend the landscape plan to provide reduced turf areas and larger landscape beds.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the revised Landscape Plans prepared by Lark Landscape Architecture in Attachment 3. The front
garden bed has been revised to include entirely deep planted landscapes, removing the turfed areas previously
proposed.




Our ref: 220609                                                                                                Page 2 of 4