08/1166 - Preliminary Building Works assessable against the Planning [As Published] · 172008.1166

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

 

IDAS Assessment Checkist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
EWITHINTHELIMITSOFAPORT CC vee
1.4} Is Any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?

No-Gotoa1s (_] Yes

 

[DECLARED FISH HABITAT AREA __

ILyes, is that part of the premises below high water mark?
[LINo

U0 Yes - itanswers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8 — Answer (a) to (c) below. This application requires assessment by

the Port Authority for the land. if you answer no to (a), (b) and
(c} below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Age

ancy.
(a) _ Is any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port?
CI No LD Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

(0) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds?
(No (1 Yes - the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency,

(c) _ Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan?

oO No O Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

IP Reguiation, schedule 2, table 2, kems 15 end 16.

 

1.5

 

Does ery part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?
0 + Goto 01.6

(J Yes - ifanswers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate thal the

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2. tam 26.

proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8
this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). if DPI&F is not the Assessment
Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

};COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE _ ee _
1.6 | Is apy part of the premises designated for community infrastructure?
No - Gotoar.7 [1] Yes
tyes, is the community infrastructure intended to be provided by a public sector entity?
No Yes
Ityes, is the land owned by or on behalf of the State?
{J Yes OONo
If no, is the development for the following?
(i) For the designated purpose Lino (LYes
(ii) Carried out by, or on behaif of, the designator [ino DYes
If no to either or both (i) or (ii) above, is the proposed development assessable under the planning scheme?
| No QO Yes - This application must be reterred to the Queenstand Govemment department administering the Act authorising the
development for the designation as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, Rem ?.
WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT _ j __. —_
1.7] Dogg the proposal involve the establishment or expansion of a waste water disposal system?
No - Endof Sections [[] Yes
tfyes, is any part of the disposal system proposed to be located in an area declared to be a catchment area under the Water Act 2000?
L] No - Eng of Section 1 UJ Yes
Ityes, is the proposed waste water disposal system an environmentally relevant activity (ERA) under the Environmental
Protection Act 1994?
[Ves - End of Section: [No
Ino, is the proposed development involving the waste water disposal system assessable under the planning scheme?
Oo No - End of Section 1 Yes - This application requires assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as
Concurrence Agency. End of Section 1
JP Regulation, scheduk 2, tabie 3, xem 5.

 

 

 

Page 4