Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

08/1166 - Preliminary Building Works assessable against the Planning [As Published] · 172008.1166

of 23

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Nor MCU
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 __ eee IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

SECTI O N 2 Section 2 must be completed | when | the application Seeks approval to materially change the use. of premises.
PLANNIN SCHEME .
21 je proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?
No-Gotea22 [[] Yes — complete Form 1, Part D and answer 02.1.1 - 2.1.13 below
It yes, does the application request that the proposal be assessed against a superseded planning scheme?
LINo Oo Yes - (Complete Form 1 Attachment 1)
STATE-CONTROLLEDROAD _ __ ee
2.1.1 | Is any part of the premises ‘located i in part ofa 2 future State-controlled road, or within 100m ofa Siate-controlled road?
0 Yes

if yes, is the use proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?

oO Yes - This application must be referrad to the Department of Main Roads {OMR) as Advice Agency.
ae No - This application must be refered to DMR as Concurrence Agency.

No

If ng, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the /ntegrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified threshold?

No Oo Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3. tems Jia) and 3,

ACID SULFATE SOILS ... -:
2.1.2 so it proposed in a local govemment area listed2:" in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development involving

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acifi Sulfate Soils?
No-Gotoaz13 ()Yes

It yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises less than 20m AHD?

CINo (J Yes
If yes, will the proposed use involve the following?
(i) Excavating more than 1,000m: of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD [No Yes
(ii) Filling the premises with 1,000m: or more of material with an average depth of 0.5m on land, soil []No [-] Yes
or sediment at or below 5m AHD

{f yes to elther or both (i) or (ii) above - This appfcation must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as Advice Agency.
JP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, item 4; State Psanning PoBcy 2'02: Planning and Managing Development aoe Acx Sulfate Soils, section 3.8.

ICOASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2.1.3 | Does the proposed use involve the following?

 

 

 

 

 

J
(i) Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district &1No |C1 Yes
(ii) Carrying out building work, comptetety or partly in a coastal management district, that is the ia No /(] Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m2
{iii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, that is the [ZTNo O1Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?

 

 

 

 

 

If yes to any one of (i) — (iii) above - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Concurrence Agency.
iP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, fem €

 

 

VEGETATIONCLEARING © ©
2.1.4 |Do the premises include a lot containing the following?
{i} Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) DONo Cres
(ii) If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation LINe L1 Yes"
It yes to either or both (i) of (ji) above, is the size of the premises 2ha or larger?
CI No - Goto 02.1.5 Yes

ne is the existing use of the premises rural or environmental?

Oo Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part J) This appiication must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as
Concurrence Agency.

 

 

 

IP Regutation, schedule 2, fabie J, item 1%.

 

21 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Cabootture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cootoola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Miriam Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday.

PageS

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.4 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1166 - Preliminary Building Works assessable against the Planning [As Published].pdf · 1.4 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.