Council archive · source document
SUPERSEDED Negotiated Report (Representations made) OPW25 0042 (As Published) · OPW25/0042
g. Establishment of a communication protocol in the form of an information and response
website, and correspondence to adjoining owners, emergency services and local
businesses to advise of agreed construction times, impacts on traffic and services and
other relevant issues.
h. Include a post out to the local residents and businesses along the haulage route from
the Serenity Close cul-de-sac to the Leslie/Noosa Drive bridge advising of the
proposed development including the expected time frames and the site contact details.
i. Include signage in prominent locations on the boundaries of the site advising of the
proposed development, the expected time frames and the site contact details.
j. identification of complaint management procedures including:
i. contact details for the on-site manager.
ii. dispute resolution procedures.
k. details on the location of external fill/dump sites/sources, the haulage route, type of
vehicle to be utilised during filling operations and frequency of usage. Note any
damage to the existing road system as a result of haulage operations shall be fully
repaired at the applicant’s expense.
B. Refuse the representations made to Conditions 5, 11c & 13 for the following reasons:
1. Council has decided to refuse the representations made to Condition 5. The $100,000
compliance bond is imposed to secure the performance of the conditions held within this
Operational Works permit, not the conditions of the higher order Material Change of Use
permit (132008.176.05).
2. Council has decided to refuse the representations made to Condition 11c. The proposed
haulage route is likely to experience degradation due to the geometry of the roads (i.e.,
roundabouts, tight turns, extent of road furniture, up-and-down grades, etc.). Council
acknowledges the haulage route west of the Webya Road/Noosa Drive currently
experiences substantial traffic volumes; however, these volumes are unlikely to consist of
heavy vehicles under load. Council believes the condition is reasonable and relevant and
is in the best interest of both parties to protect themselves during haulage works.
3. Council has decided to refuse the representations made to Condition 13. The bond is
imposed to secure the performance of any municipal asset(s) and provides a financial
incentive for the applicant to undertake the necessary maintenance and/or rectification
works on the asset during the maintenance period and before asset handover to Council.
Council will not accept an asset as ‘on maintenance’ without a municipal works bond
(referred to as a ‘Maintenance Bond’).
Page 7 of 7
Document Set ID: 24109099
Version: 6, Version Date: 25/09/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
SUPERSEDED Negotiated Report (Representations made) OPW25 0042 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 142 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.