Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

sdap-v2-6-state-code-8 (1).pdf

of 7

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 Performance outcomes                                     Acceptable outcomes                    Response
 PO12 Development:                                        No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Complies – no mapped vegetation
      1. avoids impacts on category C areas of
          vegetation and category R areas of
          vegetation; or
      2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category
          C areas of vegetation and category R areas
          of vegetation after demonstrating avoidance
          is not reasonably possible.
 Public use of and access to state coastal land
 PO13 Development maintains or enhances public use        No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Complies – no impact on state coastal land
 of and access to and along state coastal land (except
 where this is contrary to the protection of coastal
 resources or public safety).
 PO14 Private marine development ensures that             No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Not applicable – not private marine development
 works:
      1. are used for marine access purposes only
      2. minimise the use of state coastal land
      3. do not interfere with access between
          navigable waterways and adjacent properties.
 PO15 Development ensures erosion control                 No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Not applicable – no erosion control structures
 structures are located within the premises they are                                             proposed
 intended to protect unless there is no feasible
 alternative.
 Matters of state environmental significance
 PO16 Development:                                        No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Not applicable – no mapped Matters of State
      1. avoids impacts on matters of state                                                      Environmental Significance
          environmental significance; or
      2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters
          of state environmental significance after
          demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably
          possible; and
      3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all
          reasonable avoidance, minimisation and
          mitigation measures are undertaken, the

State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works                                                                               Page 4 of 7


[OCR of page images]
a aCSIT- Lae meleicereitl-)

PO12 Development:

1. avoids impacts on category C areas of
vegetation and category R areas of
vegetation; or

2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category
C areas of vegetation and category R areas
of vegetation after demonstrating avoidance
is not reasonably possible.

Acceptable outcomes

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Response
Complies — no mapped vegetation

 

Public use of and access to state coastal land

 

PO13 Development maintains or enhances public use
of and access to and along state coastal land (except
where this is contrary to the protection of coastal
resources or public safety).

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Complies — no impact on state coastal land

 

PO14 Private marine development ensures that
works:
1. are used for marine access purposes only
2. minimise the use of state coastal land
3. do not interfere with access between
navigable waterways and adjacent properties.

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Not applicable — not private marine development

 

PO15 Development ensures erosion control
structures are located within the premises they are
intended to protect unless there is no feasible
alternative.

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Not applicable — no erosion control structures
proposed

 

Matters of state environmental significance

 

PO16 Development:

1. avoids impacts on matters of state
environmental significance; or

2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters
of state environmental significance after
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably
possible; and

3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all
reasonable avoidance, minimisation and
mitigation measures are undertaken, the

 

 

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

 

Not applicable — no mapped Matters of State
Environmental Significance

 

State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works

Page 4 of 7

 

Log in to download the original (sdap-v2-6-state-code-8 (1).pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.