Council archive · source document
07/1841 - Representations Received [As Published] · 132007.1841
H ken hicks 19 June 2008 AND ASSOCIATES Our Ref: 060253 Council Ref: 2007/1841 Noosa Council PO Box 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 ATTENTION: = Tracy Arthur Dear Tracy REPRESENTATIONS ON DECISION NOTICE APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE - INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS TYPE 1 WAREHOUSE & TYPE 2 PRODUCTION, ALTERATION, REPACKAGING & REPAIRING AND EDUCATION TYPE 3 — ADULT 26 EENIE CREEK ROAD, NOOSAVILLE LOT 1 ON SP182880 Further to Council’s Decision Notice issued for the above development application and the applicants subsequent suspension of the appeal period on 6 June 2008, the following representation about conditions is made and a Negotiated Decision Notice requested. Condition 11 Condition 11 requires the provision for a minimum 80 bicycle parking spaces (equivalent to 40 hoops) to be provided. 11.1 requires this to comprise a minimum 50 class 2 staff spaces and 11.2 requires a minimum 30 class 3 visitor spaces. This condition is considered to be unreasonable imposition on the development, with the practicalities of achieving this outcome not properly considered. The applicant’s traffic consultant Burchill VDM has provided the following advice: Employee density for industry is typically in the range of 50sqm per employee. The proposal is for a total GFA of 9,500sqm for light industry. On this basis, approximately 190 employees would be expected at the site. According to Census data for Noosa Shire, 7% of work trips are walk / cycle trips. This equates to 14 trips for the estimated employee base. Queensland Transport initiatives to encourage cycling are providing a slow increase in use of this mode of transport. Taking these factors into consideration, a total provision of 30 bicycle spaces would be appropriate for this development. This provision would be ample for current and future staff use with bicycle parking spaces available for visitors also. Notwithstanding this advice the applicant is still prepared to provide 40 bicycle parking spaces as proposed with the application. Class 2 spaces require locked compounds with communal access using duplicate keys. These compounds should be fitted with a roof for increased security and weather protection. 11.1 effectively requires 4 — 5 spaces per building. Attached in Appendix A are some examples of secure bicycle compounds. It appears that prefabricated compounds are for larger bicycle storage (ie minimum 10 bicycles) and as such the compounds as required would need to be purpose built. To comply with standards for these TOWN PLANNERS | CONSULTING SURVEYORS | URBAN DESIGNERS | PROJECT MANAGERS Ken Hicks & Associates Pty Ltd | [email protected] | A.C.N. 010 278 823 | A.B.N. 74 308 405 611 Suite 7 Dalton Centre, 1 Newspaper Place 18/42 King Street 61-73 Sturt Street PO Box 6380, MAROOCHYDORE BC, Qid 4588 POBox 1712, CABOOLTURE, Qid 4510 PO Box 5027, TOWNSVILLE, Qld 4810 P 0754432844 F 0754437146 P 0754595318 =F 07 5495 5317 P 0747213066 =F: 07 4721 3088
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 9 pages
Page 2
compounds they would need to be located visible from the central driveway. As such they would need to be sited within the frontage landscape area (this would be acceptable under the Noosa plan as landscaped area includes areas occupied by bicycle racks) or as a replacement for a carpark. These secure compounds would result in a negative amenity impact upon the development. Given that the layout of the development has very good casual surveillance and security supervision of all carparking areas, it is considered appropriate that all bicycle parking spaces could be provided as class 3. Amendment of condition 11 is requested to reduce the total number of bicycle parking spaces to 40, to be provided as class 3 and dispersed across the site. Condition 12 Condition 12 requires the provision of a separate shower/change room/locker facility within each tenancy of buildings B, C, D, I, H & G and common facilities comprising a minimum 6 unisex shower/change room/locker within building K to service the remainder of the development. This results in the need for 19 shower/change room/locker facilities. This condition considerably exceeds the requirement of the planning scheme and is considered an unreasonable imposition on the development. The Driveways and Parking Code requires under $15.3 the provision of 1 shower/change room/tocker per 10 bicycle spaces provided. Having regard to existing condition 11, which requires 80 bicycle spaces, only 8 shower/change room/locker facilities would be required. Having regard to our representation on condition 11 above, only 4 shower/change room/locker facilities would be required. The application provided for 7 shower/change room/locker facilities (comprising 3 female, 3 male and 1 unisex shower) within building K to service the entire development. Having regard to the Driveways and Parking Code and condition 11 representation, this provision is more than adequate to service the development. It is noted that the condition currently allows for buildings E & F to utilise the common facilities within building K. These buildings are further away from the common facilities that buildings B, C, D, 1, H & G which require separate individual facilities. On this basis there could be no argument that the location of the proposed common facilities is not adequate to service the entire development. Amendment of condition 12 is requested to delete the requirement for the provision of a separate shower/change room/locker facilities within each tenancy of buildings B, C, D, I, H & G and provide for common shower/change room/locker facilities within building k for a minimum of 7 shower/change room/locker facilities. Condition 13 Condition 13 requires a minimum roof pitch of 5 degrees to be provided to all buildings. While this condition could be achieved, concern is raised that this will result in compromise to the proposed building aesthetic and is not necessary to achieve roof form outcome O21 of the Noosaville Locality Code. Of the 11 proposed buildings, 3 have a 5 degree pitch, 1 curved and 7 have a 3 degree pitch. The building designs and layout will ensure varied roof forms and interesting skyline throughout the development as required by 021. The building form with a 5 degree roof pitch will remain generally the same however the building volume and facade height will increase. Currently the scale, height and proportion of the buildings are well balanced, resulting in a good aesthetic. Increasing the roof pitch to 5 degrees will compromise this aesthetic and not result in any marked difference or improvement in achieving roof form outcome O21 of the Noosaville Locality Code.
Page 3
Amendment of condition 13 is requested to require minimum roof pitches in accordance with the approved plans. Condition 22 Condition 22 requires building K to remain in common property “to allow for research and development facilities to support the industrial uses". This requirement is both irrelevant to and an unreasonable imposition of the development. Building K will be utilised for both educational purposes and as common meeting/gym facility. There has never been any proposal for this facility to be for “research and development”. If the site is retained in a single ownership this condition would not create any operational difficulties, however if the site is subdivided under a community titles scheme it would mean that Building K had to remain under the ownership of the Body Corporate and could not be tet or sold on a commercial basis. This places an unrealistic economic burden on the developer and brings into question the financial feasibility and appropriateness of establishing this facility on the site. As detailed with the application, the applicant has proposed this facility as a community benefit to relocate the existing Noosa Community Training Centre currently existing elsewhere within the site and which will be demolished as a result of other site development. It is essential for the inclusion of this facility to be successful, that no restriction is placed on its titling ability. To ensure this facility can be utilised as a common meeting/gym facility for the overall development the condition could be amended to require the gym and toilet/shower facilities to be accessible at all times for use by other tenants, with the conference/meeting facility available on a booking system managed by the education tenant. Deletion of the requirement of condition 22 to remain in common property and reference to “research and development facilities” is requested. Condition 26 Condition 26 requires the driveway access connection to Rene Street to be a maximum width of 7m at the property boundary. This requirement would result in the inability of the development to achieve appropriate articulated vehicle access. Articulated vehicle access is considered necessary and required by the planning scheme. The driveway crossover shown on the proposal plan is based on Barlow Gregg VDM review of their Autoturn computer program. A drawing prepared by Barlow Gregg VDM showing the articulated vehicle swept path is attached in Appendix B. Amendment of condition 26 is requested to delete reference to a maximum width of 7m. Condition 36 Condition 36.1 requires carspace 8 to be a dedicated turning area and 36.2 requires carspace 9 to be dedicated as ‘staff’. Having regard to the layout plan and condition 36.2 which allows tandem staff parking for carspaces 9 and 10, it would seem more appropriate to dedicate carspace 9 as a turning area rather than carspace 8. This would achieve the same result in provision of a dedicated turning bay, but would improve the carparking situation by removing the tandem staff arrangement of spaces 9 and 10. Amendment of condition 36 is requested to require carspace 9 as the dedicated turning area. Condition 37.3, 39.3, 41.2, 42.2, 44.4 & 46.3 Conditions 37.3, 39.3, 41.2, 42.2, 44.4 & 46.3 require the loading bays to be clear of the carparking aisle. Upon review of the plans it is considered that this condition will have substantial design implications upon the approved layout, is not necessary to comply with AS2890.2 and is therefore an irrelevant and unreasonable imposition on the development. The applicant's traffic consultant Burchill VDM has provided the following advice:
Page 4
Due to the type of land use, that is, light industry, it is anticipated that servicing will not be of such a frequency to require loading areas separate to the car parking areas. The Australian Standard for Parking Facilities Part 2: Off-street commercial vehicle facilities (AS2890.2) provides guidance for service provisions. In Section 4 Service Areas, this document states the following: The design of service areas must: ¢ Provide for the largest design vehicle likely to use the facility — in this case, a 12.5m HRV. @ Aminor service area may be located on part of the internal roadway system at the site provided the occasional obstruction to other traffic by manoeuvring trucks can be tolerated. Taking into account that the service areas will not be heavily utilised, and that these areas have been designed with sufficient manoeuvring area, it is considered that these fall under the classification of a ‘minor service area’. Furthermore, the time for service vehicles manoeuvring into the loading bays would not involve a long period. Hence, the period of obstruction to traffic, based on the proposed layout, would be very short. Taking these factors into consideration, the proposed service arrangements comply AS2890.2 and are considered appropriate for the site. Deletion of conditions 37.3, 39.3, 41.2, 42.2, 44.4 & 46.3 is requested. Condition 60 Condition 60 requires the submission of a report prepared by an ecologist that assesses the impacts of the revised Stormwater Management Plans on the downstream ecologically sensitive areas. Given that the proposed revised Stormwater Management Plans will have the same water quality objectives as the original Stormwater Management Plan, which has been accepted by Council and assessed by an ecologist, this requirement is unnecessary and therefore an irrelevant imposition of the development. Deletion of condition 60 is requested. We look forward to Councils further consideration of these matters and to the issue of a negotiated decision notice. Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct. Yours faithfully KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES Scott Sobey; DIRECTOR
Page 5
APPENDIX A
Page 6
Bike Storage Solutions: secure bicycle compounds Home Materials Workshop Storage Office & Facility Handling Equip. Products Commercial Mgmt Safety/ Offers Environment ESE Direct > Products Cycle Storage > Cycle Compounds Secure Cycle Compounds Warehouse/ Distribution Page | of 2 Site & Security SPECIFICATIONS Cycle Compound with Lockable Gate To Fit Size (h,w,d in mm) Code 16 Bikes (2 x 8 racks) 2100, 5500, 3000 SWC215530G2 32 Bikes (4 x 8 racks) 2100, 5500, 6000 SWC215560G4 48 Bikes (6 x 8 racks) 2100, 5500, 9000 SWC215590G6 Cycle Compound with Lockable Gate & Central Security Canopy http://www.esedirect.co.uk/cycle-compounds.asp 4/06/2008
Page 7
Bike Storage Solutions: secure bicycle compounds
To Fit Size (h,w,d in mm) Code
16 Bikes (2 x 8 racks) 2600, 5500, 3000 SWC265530S2
32 Bikes (4 x 8 racks) 2600, 5500, 6000 SWC265560S4
48 Bikes (6 x 8 racks) 2600, 5500, 9000 SWC265590S6
FRAME COLOUR OPTIONS
For required frame colour please add
corresponding suffix to product code
ap Gos
3 Order Secure Cycle Compounds from our online catalogue.
Read about Cycle Storage Solutions.
Hi IITTT
rf
Page 2 of 2
g
5
For further information or advice on any of our cycle storage products, please contact us and we will be happy to help!
http://www.esedirect.co.uk/cycle-compounds.asp
4/06/2008
Page 8
SiteMap Contact Us
Cycle Shelters
Chelsea Cycle Shelter
Thomas Grey Cycle
Shelter
Secure Compounds
Large Cycle Compounds
ng Shelters
isea
aiting Smoking
Crystal View Smok
Shelter
Canopies/ Walkways
Entrance Canopy
attice Style Canop
ar Park Shelters
School/Park Shelters
Tilly Teen Shelter
The Poppy Shi
er
Play Area Canopy
Parent Waiting Shelter
Bus Shelters
Bus Sheitars
Customer information
The Design Pr
ng a
Searet
| bike storage sheds will therefore be valued and used more frequently
CAD - Secure Cycle Compounds Page | of 1
Links
Home » Secure Compounds
The secure bike storage shelters illustrated below are based upon our
new Chelsea bike storage shelters. The secure bike sheds are
supplied with hinged gates and fitted with a hasp and staple so you
can supply your own padlock. The addition of gates to the secure bike
storage sheds will make them much more appealing to the cyclist. the
The bicycie storage sheds are available in a range of colours and
Claddings. For example the compound above has a powder coated
blue colour matched finish and a transparent cladding. We also
provide a full ground levelling service and concrete base if your
secure bike storage compounds need to be fitted onto uneven or | pe
loose soil. If you are unsure about finishes, claddings or concrete |
base. then please contact one of our experts who will assist you in
deciding the best options for you. With over ten years experience we
are in an excellent position to advise you on the best choices that
|: Xs
e Suitable for you
20 Bike shelter 40 Bike shelter 80 Bike shelter 100 Bike shelter
We have years of experience in supplying secure bike sheds and cycle shelters to schools and public areas and will work
professionally with the school or organisation to meet your highest standards and expectations. All of our secure bike storage
sheds comply with the full TUV UK QA standards. If you need bike sheds to be fitted during summer holidays or half term then
please order now and book your installation time in advance as the bike sheds are very popular and we cannot guarantee a
delivery time at short notice If you are unsure about an aspect of the secure bike storage unit then please contact us on 01704
896050 or contact us regarding your bike shelters using our contact us form
TUV
Secure Bike Storage Formations
Product Reference Overall Dimensions Capacity
Bike Storage for 10 4m x 2m 10 Cycies
Bike Storage for 20 6m x 4m 20 Cycies
Bike Storage for 30 6m x 6m 30 Cycles
Bike Storage for 40 8m x 6m 40 Cycles
Bike Storage for 60 12m x 6m 60 Cycles
Bike Storage for 80 16m x 6m 80 Cycles
Bike Storage for 100 20m x 6m 100 Cycies
learn more about our cycle shelters
[Back]
tents are the copyright of www cadshelters co.uk
7 Website Design and by pianetpedia co uk a webdesign and SEO Company
http://www.cadshelters.co.uk/bike-storage-and-cycle-shelters.html 4/06/2008
Page 9
APPENDIX B
Page 10
3/05/2008 11:54:49 AM LOT3 LAYOUT N.T.S Wyse TITLE: TE MAY 2008 AS SHOWN This ig the property of ine engreer, ond BSS BARLOW GREGG MARRINMALIARTICULATED VEHICLE foo au, y not be used, copied, or reproduced wholly, CONSILTINS ENGINEERS awn NT ta poet without the esoress permission of B D> ange Zw rnwasms — ISWEPT PLATH 2 @ engineer. Infringement in any woy may : 5 PB. oar ae nepal acon G “ nemeas 1 QT 3. NOOSAVILLE CORAL COAST: Fiqured dimensions take precedence over 7 fe . Pree 91 AE 355 RSSOUIATED CONSULTANTS cae arity all mensions om ite ie ston out BM080320-P01
Used in these records
07/1841 - Representations Received [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.4 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.