Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Development Assessment Report

of 25

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 PROJECT URBAN – 20281                                                                                   March 21



 Overall Outcomes                                           Comment
 retained and protected from the impacts of
 development and any unavoidable impacts are
 minimised through location, design, operation and
 management requirements.

 (p) Native vegetation between buildings and in the         Complies: the landscape plant palette includes
 public realm enhances the amenity and supports             native vegetation that will enhance the public realm
 local wildlife.                                            and creative an attractive setting along the property
                                                            boundaries.


A detailed assessment of the proposal against the relevant Performance and Acceptable outcomes in the
Zone Code has been undertaken and is included in Attachment 1. The assessment has identified that the
proposal complies with all the relevant Acceptable outcomes except for some of the minimum setbacks set
out in AO9.1, AO9.2 and AO17.1 alternative solutions are discussed below.


7.5.1      ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS

Acceptable Outcomes AO9.1 and AO9.2 – Building Setbacks

AO9.1 and AO9.2 read as follows:

        AO9.1
        “Buildings and structures meet the following minimum boundary setbacks:
               (a)   For frontages:
                        (i)     first and second storeys— 6 metres
                        (ii)    third storey and thereafter—10 metres
                  (b)   Side boundaries—
                        (i)     1.5 metre setback up to 4.5 metres height;
                        (ii)    2 metres setback between 4.5 metres and 7.5 metres height; and
                        (iii)   2 metres plus 500 millimetres for every 3 metres above 7.5 metres
                                height or part thereof
                  (c)   Rear boundary
                        (i)     first and second storeys—6 metres
                        (ii)    third storey and thereafter— 8 metres”

         AO9.2
         “ The front 6 metres of the property is landscaped open space, provided that uncovered
         visitor parking, or swimming pools protruding no more than 1 metre above the ground
         level, can be as close as 2 metres from the front boundary” .

The proposal complies with these minimum setbacks except in the following cases:

              •     part of the front deck on the third level encroaches approximately 2m into the preferred
                    minimum 10m setback to the front boundary;

              •     the rear deck on the third level extends approximately 2m into the preferred minimum 8m
                    setback to the rear boundary.

                    In both these instances the actual habitable dwelling line complies with the acceptable
                    outcome.


 Development Assessment Report                                                                          Page 17 of 25
 Material Change of Use for a Multiple Dwelling – 4 Units
 31 Bottlebrush Avenue, Noosa Heads QLD 4567
Log in to download the original file

Development Assessment Report.pdf · 1.6 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.