Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

2022 04 11 RFI further response - Stockwell · MCU21/0146

of 9

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

    4. Layered building forms with different façade finishes, full height shutter screens, deepened
       balconies.
    5. Building materials are fragmented to defined building edges and define each building form.
    6. Building A and B provides for large recesses at main entries to animate the building entries and form.
    7. Light and shadow animated by use of balconies, screens, slats and awning windows; and
    8. Articulated roof form
    9. Landscaping between buildings and throughout the development



Item 7




It is my view with regard to good design practice as well as the intentions of the Noosa Plan, that
the 12m height limit is not intended to be completely filled with ‘saleable storeys’ topped by a low
pitch skillion roof plane, but the 12m height window is envisaged to accommodate 2/3
storeys as well as the variations and articulations in roof form that contribute to subtropical design
character and the skyline.




Response

The Architectural plans demonstrate three separate buildings with an animated and layered roof form with a
general pitch of between 3- 7 degrees and in some places 10 degrees.

Item 8

Used in these records

About this file

File size
536 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

2022 04 11 RFI further response - Stockwell.pdf · 536 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.