Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

2022 04 11 RFI further response - Stockwell · MCU21/0146

of 9

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Response

The Architectural proposal provides for a dynamic mix of dwelling types and sizes capable of adapting to
different household types. This can be evidenced by:

    •    All lots are defined as small dwellings and under 100mtr2
    •    Diverse mix of dwelling types to cater for a range of household types and needs.
    •    Diversity of product type addresses various price ranges in the market.
    •    All lots are accessible and allow for access with no step from car space to residence via internal
         access.
    •    All lots have an entry access width of 820mm minimum.
    •    All lots have a bathroom at the entry to the apartment level.
    •    41 lots are compliant with the amended 2022 September National Construction Code and the Livable
         Housing Design Guidelines Silver level for apartments promoting aging in place with bathrooms
         design to allow for future install of grab rails in showers and beside toilets.
    •    Minimum circulation space of 1200mm around toilet pans with the toilet pan located in the corner.


Item 9




Response

The Architectural Plans respond to the following characteristics of Noosa Style, they are:

    1. The built form has an appreciation of the uniqueness of place and is orientated to allow for a buffer to
       the existing Noosa Civic Shopping Centre and facilitate outlooks for all dwellings. The outlooks are to
       the street, recreational area or to the private open space.
    2. Encompasses the external environment with the creation of a recreational space for private use by all
       residents which is treated with landscaping
    3. The development is scaled to three separate building each with only 30 residences per building.
    4. Layered building forms with different façade finishes, full height shutter screens, deepened
       balconies.
    5. Building materials are fragmented to defined building edges and define each building form.
    6. Building A and B provides for large recesses at main entries to animate the building entries and form.
    7. Light and shadow animated by use of balconies, screens, slats, and awning windows; and
       articulated roof form
    8. Landscaping between buildings and throughout the development

Email 5th April 2022

As discus, the following comments relate to the review of the amended plans:

    1.   The development is an overdevelopment of the site, (Refer to response in Item 6)

    2. There is insufficient articulation in the roof forms. (Refer to response in Item 7)

Used in these records

About this file

File size
536 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

2022 04 11 RFI further response - Stockwell.pdf · 536 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.