Council archive · source document
2022 04 11 RFI further response - Stockwell · MCU21/0146
Response
The Architectural proposal provides for a dynamic mix of dwelling types and sizes capable of adapting to
different household types. This can be evidenced by:
• All lots are defined as small dwellings and under 100mtr2
• Diverse mix of dwelling types to cater for a range of household types and needs.
• Diversity of product type addresses various price ranges in the market.
• All lots are accessible and allow for access with no step from car space to residence via internal
access.
• All lots have an entry access width of 820mm minimum.
• All lots have a bathroom at the entry to the apartment level.
• 41 lots are compliant with the amended 2022 September National Construction Code and the Livable
Housing Design Guidelines Silver level for apartments promoting aging in place with bathrooms
design to allow for future install of grab rails in showers and beside toilets.
• Minimum circulation space of 1200mm around toilet pans with the toilet pan located in the corner.
Item 9
Response
The Architectural Plans respond to the following characteristics of Noosa Style, they are:
1. The built form has an appreciation of the uniqueness of place and is orientated to allow for a buffer to
the existing Noosa Civic Shopping Centre and facilitate outlooks for all dwellings. The outlooks are to
the street, recreational area or to the private open space.
2. Encompasses the external environment with the creation of a recreational space for private use by all
residents which is treated with landscaping
3. The development is scaled to three separate building each with only 30 residences per building.
4. Layered building forms with different façade finishes, full height shutter screens, deepened
balconies.
5. Building materials are fragmented to defined building edges and define each building form.
6. Building A and B provides for large recesses at main entries to animate the building entries and form.
7. Light and shadow animated by use of balconies, screens, slats, and awning windows; and
articulated roof form
8. Landscaping between buildings and throughout the development
Email 5th April 2022
As discus, the following comments relate to the review of the amended plans:
1. The development is an overdevelopment of the site, (Refer to response in Item 6)
2. There is insufficient articulation in the roof forms. (Refer to response in Item 7)
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
2022 04 11 RFI further response - Stockwell.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 536 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.