Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix F. Civil Engineering Report Part 2

Attached to the e-mail Retail Bus Type 5 & Type 2 & Op Works -Civil Eng Report Pt 2 MCU17/0572 & OPW17/0611.

of 138

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (11.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Original PDF page 56, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

        SCHEDULE 2—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL




                                                                                                                   Proposed Amendments August 2015
                     ASSESSMENT




                                                                                                  The Noosa Plan
1.            Preamble

Erosion and sediment control on building sites

Builders must not pollute the environment. The Environmental Protection Act provides for
penalties for persons or entities causing environmental harm.

Soil erosion on building sites can be a major source of sediment pollution (environmental
harm) in our watercourses. A single building site can lose up to four truckloads of soil in one
storm. Washed from the sites into stormwater drains, this sediment can cause flooding and
also affects the water quality and the fish stocks in our creeks, lakes and the Noosa River
system.

Preventing sediment run-off from building sites is one of a number of ways that Council and
industry are improving our watercourses.

Effective on-site erosion and sediment control provides the following benefits—


      A better looking, more marketable site;
      Improved wet weather working conditions;
      Reduced stockpile losses;
      Less mud and dust problems;
      Reduced clean-up costs;
      Fewer public complaints;
      Better public image;
      Cleaner watercourses; and
      Better fishing and swimming in our nearby watercourses.

2.            Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
Controlling Factors                                                   Points   Score   Checking
Predominant slope1 of the whole site, prior to
building works:
 0 - 3% slope                                                           0
 >3% - 5% slope                                                         1
 >5% - 10% slope                                                        2        1
 >10% - 15% slope                                                       4
 > 15% slope                                                            5
Soil type: (see 1 below)
 Sandy soil/gravel                                                      0
 Sandy loam                                                             1        2
1
    The term ‘predominant slope’ is defined in Part 2 Section 2.12.



                                                              S2.1
Log in to download the original file

Appendix F. Civil Engineering Report Part 2.pdf · 11.0 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.