Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Applicant Response to NC information Request

Attached to the e-mail Response to Information Request - MCU17/0024.

of 5

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

  Page 3


The project architect has reviewed the northern boundary façade and adjoining vehicular access and
proposes widening of the access to ensure vehicles are well clear of the building.

The project architect has also reviewed the northern garden bed to the park and has stepped it down
the slope to minimize height and trip hazard.

Council staff have requested that further information be provided about car parking associated with the
development noting that no further carparking can be provided on site.

The proposal represents a substantial renovation of the existing building on site with the ground floor
level of the development to be retained. In assessing renovations of existing buildings, Council has
normally considered the existing approved floor areas of buildings as equating to a ‘credit’ of
carparking space for the site. In this instance the proposal involves the upgrade of existing facilities
such a plant rooms, staircase, lift wells and kitchen and storage areas that are not included in
carparking calculations under the planning scheme and in combination with the existing approved floor
area, no additional carparking is generated due to the improved service facilities on site. This
comparison of the existing situation and proposed new works is considered a fair and reasonable
approach to the assessment of carparking for the clubhouse. It is not considered reasonable for
Council to assess carparking without regard for the existing activities on site.

The Sunshine Beach Surf Life Saving Club in association with Council officers has also investigated
the possibility of providing additional carparking in the locality noting that previous Council run ‘Place
Making’ projects did not identify any suitable areas. The club reviewed options including:

     • Extending the front carpark eastward – (not viable due to vegetation and slope impacts);

     • Extending the front carpark westward in to Webb Park – (not viable due to slope, impacts on
        park amenity and pedestrian walkway and extent of earthworks required);

     • Additional carparking in Webb Park in front of the ground floor actives area – (not viable due
        to extent of earthworks, loss of park area; conflict between pedestrians and vehicles);

     • New carpark in Webb Park with access from Webb Road - (not viable due to extent of
        earthworks, loss of park area, conflict between pedestrians and vehicles and impact on
        adjoining residences);

     • Convert existing parallel parking in Webb Road to perpendicular parking – (reviewed option
        discussed below)

The applicant engaged Tod Engineers and Project Managers to further investigate the conversion of
the parallel parking in Webb Road. Tod’s investigation has revealed that the carparking reconfiguration
results in four new carparking spaces being provided in Webb Road. A copy of the engineering plans
are attached (Attachment D).


Item 4: A noise impact assessment prepared by a suitably qualified person which addresses noise
emissions from the operation of the proposed development including recommendations for acoustic
noise controls.

Applicant’s Response to Item 4: Please find attached a noise report prepared by David Moore and
Associates (Attachment E)


Item 5: Consideration of the potential impact of the proposed development on the view lines of
surrounding properties to the north, south and west. It is recommended that this consideration address
the levels of surrounding properties and includes sight line diagrams.

Applicant’s Response to Item 5: Please find attached plans detailing sight lines from Costa Nova to
the north of the site (Attachment F). The balconies from Costa Nova were considered to be the most
relevant for sight lines due to their proximity to the clubhouse and lack of vegetation in front of the
Log in to download the original file

Applicant Response to NC information Request.pdf · 702 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.