Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

SUPERSEDED - Decision Notice - Concurrence Agency - EPA [As Published] · 142008.383

of 15

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

    2008/383




Page 11 of 15


[OCR of page images]
2008/383

 

Concurrence Agency Response
EPA Permit number: _IPCC01117608

21. All organically enriched sand removed from the top layer (topsoil) within the proposed development areas
must be stockpiled separately prior to excavation, and respread over the development area after re-
profiling as part of the revegetation works. .

22. Allareas of exposed sand are to be stabilised against wind erosion during the construction period.

23. Al material excavated from a dunal system for construction works must be placed, ievelled and stabilised
against wind erosion on the seaward side of the building or structure.

24. Any erosion or loss of sand surrounding the works that occurs because of changes caused by the works
must be rectified.

25. Immediately following construction of the works:
«The dunal areas are to be re-profiled to achieve the natural profile of the system;

« Disturbed areas are to be stabilised against wind erosion and rainwater run-off erosion and
revegetated through the re-establishment of the endemic native plants common to the site;

« - The revegetated area is to be fenced off where necessary to prevent pedestrian access across the
area; and

« Riparian vegetation is to be re-instated adjacent to the access jetty where existing vegetation is
disturbed ang.where existing pump infrastructure is removed.

26. The drainage of process overflow waters and stormwater associated with the sand shifter pumping station
must not cause erosion of the dune or beach system.

Site Access

27. Access to the permanent pumping station site shall be along the designated vehicle access track, and the
surrounding dunal vegetation must be maintained to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection
Agency.

oe, eee en

Coastal Management

28. The sand shifting activity and/or associated activities must not cause any long-term maintenance and
management implications

Erosion Prone Areas and Coastal Hazards

29. The Sunshine Coast Regional Council shall be responsible for the removal of the works, if in the opinion
> of the Environmental, Protection Agency, the works causes unacceptable adverse effects or suffers the
effects of erosion to the extent that it becomes a danger to the public.

30. Should the sand shifting facility and associated infrastructure be damaged as a result of sea erosion the
Sunshine Coast Regional Council shall be responsible for the removal of all debris from the beach.

31. In the event of damage or loss by of the works by sea erosion, the Sunshine Coast Regional Council
must submit another application if reconstruction of the works is proposed.

32. Awritten undertaking from the Sunshine Coast Regional Council is to be received by the Environmental
Protection Agency agreeing that the works will be considered to be an expendable structure and that no
protection works, other than beach nourishment will be carried out in the event of an erosion threat.

 

Page 5 of 7 . Environmental Protection Agency

Page 11 of 15

Used in these records

About this file

File size
494 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

SUPERSEDED - Decision Notice - Concurrence Agency - EPA [As Published].pdf · 494 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.