Council archive · source document
07/1259 - Architects preliminary plans [As Published] · 132007.1259
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
, Page 2 7
20517 i
Over the past weeks we have been seeking a further appointment with Council Officers to present this latest
scheme which takes into consideration ongoing feedback from Council Officers together with our
interpretation of the planning scheme. As you are aware the recent series of meetings with Council have
focused on the development controls of site cover and GFA for the proposal, and this is the content of this
submission. It is our position that based on site cover and GFA, the revised proposal complies with the
planning scheme.
The enclosed plans have been submitted to allow Council to consider the redesign prior to convening another
meeting with the Applicant. As you are aware the Applicant has approached the assessment of the
development proposal in a collaborative manner, working closely and respectfully with Council Officers. Our
Client is desirous to continue along this path and would welcome a meeting at your earliest connivance to
discuss the enclosed plans and Councils’ position going forward,
We look forward to understanding when Council is available to discuss the proposal, however should you
require any further details or clarification in the interim please do not hesitate to contact Mark Carter or the
writer
Yours faithfully
Conicg (Brisb ho Pty Ltd
AVIN EDWARDS
cc Ms Kerri Coyle (Kerri. [email protected])
Mr Tony Scanlon ([email protected])
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/1259 - Architects preliminary plans [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.6 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.