Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

07/2605 - Preliminary Building Works Assessable Against the Planning Scheme [As Published] · 172007.2605

of 33

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checkilst, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
‘STATE- CONTROLLED ROAD ~ “ — |

 

 

 

2.1.1 Is any part of the premises within 400m of a + State-controlied road, or part of a future State-controlled toad?

(I Yes
—X] No

If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?
(1) Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.

<i

IP Reguiation, schedule 2, table 3, items 1{a} and 3

ACIDSULFATESOLS re

 

——— |

24 2 Is the use proposed in a Iocal government area listed? in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?

LI No
& Yes

2 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Calms, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

If yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises less than 20m AHD?

No
LJ Yes

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 4
State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Mariaging Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 3.6

 

[COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?
p ne nt district & No DO Yes
ent district, that is the No Yes

© Carrying out building work, comPfetely or partly in a coastal management district, thatisthe BJ No OYes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?

 

  

¢ Carrying out operational work, ¢

if yes to any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 6

 

 

 

[VEGETATION CLEARING a “7
4a Do the premises include alot containing the | following? a
© Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) No (Yes
e If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation & No OO Yes
IP Regulation. schedule 2, table 3, item 11
‘CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE _ “j

 

2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?
[X1__ Yes - (Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency.

L] No
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 42

[PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT - oT em |

2 16 Isthe proposed use listed in schedule 13C of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified threshold?
(Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.

J No

IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, item 14

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.8 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2605 - Preliminary Building Works Assessable Against the Planning Scheme [As Published].pdf · 1.8 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.