Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

15230_Information Response_100915

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0069 Information Response & Amended Plans.

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Information Required
Provide engineering designs for the driveway that includes:
        (a) The final location/layout of the building if amended due to Unitywater’s requirements for
            clearance and sewer easement.
        (b) The plan of the driveway including the street kerb line and the development parking areas
            that shows all relevant site features including finish surface levels, existing aboveground
            services (i.e. Optus telecommunication pit) and a proposed concrete footpath along the
            property frontage (minimum width 1.5m).
        (c) The longitudinal section of the driveway including a compliant 1.5m wide concrete
            footpath and any required adjustment to existing pits and services.

Response:
Discussion regarding this issue has been held between Dianne Hayes from RoadPro and Councils Mark
Lewis. We understand the primary issue is in relation to the Optus pit. The detail survey within the
attached amended proposal plans includes the location of the Optus Pit. No change to the driveway
location is required and the longitudinal section provided within the original Traffic Report remains
current. Optus have been consulted regarding their pit and have no objection to the location of the
driveway. Refer email included within Attachment 2.

3. Stormwater Management

Stormwater management plan for the developed site.

Information Required
A stormwater management plan is required that address in particular:
       (d) Collection and disposal of stormwater flows into a lawful point of discharge in accordance
            with Queensland Urban Drainage Manuel.
       (e) No increase in stormwater runoff from the site.
       (f) No adverse impact on the existing drainage conditions on other properties, the road
            grassed verge and/or the footpath by diverting flows or causing additional stormwater
            ponding.

Response:
Duke Street provides the lawful point of discharge for the site. There are no site constraints that will
prevent the implementation of an appropriate stormwater management plan for the site, with the
design providing for adequate area outside of the building footprint for any necessary detention. The
requirement for a stormwater management plan can be conditioned and provided as part of a
subsequent operational works application.

The Information and Referral Stage of IDAS has now concluded and the application is now in the
Decision Stage.

Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct.

Yours faithfully
KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS




Scott Sobey
DIRECTOR
Email: [email protected]
Log in to download the original file

15230_Information Response_100915.pdf · 400 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.