Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-11-10 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda

of 88

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   10 NOVEMBER 2015




                                                          Page 13 of 88

INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                                                                               10 NOVEMBER 2015

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Attachment | Final Evatuaton Worksheet
                                                                                                                                  Final Evaluation

                                                                                                          Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet

                                                      ene                 —__                          [as
                                                No.|NAME OF TENDERER                                      Rates Submitted             [+—_+—__}+_+_+__+_#_ +_                                              _
                                                  1 [DownerEDIWorks(A)                                 CdS                           eo                  —    #        “       *       ¢        .      2        8     ce
                                                  3 |Reniworth River Sand Ph Ua ey                       |.              #7          The ratings
                                                 4 [Tropic Asphalts Pty Ltd(0)__————SSCSCSCSCS SCS                       SF           +0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fal for that cnteria and extreme risk
                                                  © | grrr                                               Se                           * 20 (twenty) = Very Poor ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is of 2 low standard and high risk
                                                  0 eee eee                                                                           * 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
                                                                                 ee                                                   + 60 (sixty) = Good — the content of the submission for that criteria 's mertable and wil need to be monitored i awarded
                                                  Be                                                                                  * 80 (eighty) = Very Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
                                                  9p                                                                                  * 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptonal - the content of the submission for that critera is fiawiess / outstanding and most advantageous
                                                by                                   Te                                              Once aill the data 1s entered the resutant scores based on the pnce and non pnce elements are automatically calculated for you
                                                  OT
                                                 912                                           ee
                                                 6
                                                 16
                                                     NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                                                                 Number of Tenders Evaluated     =    [4 ]
                                                   Po                                                   Bo not evaluate    |
                                                                                                                       1                  2                   3                  4

                                                    pescnrnon                         | wocwrmos | sa] See [oust] Set [oo] SS | oer] SE
                                                                                                                   wegring             weighing            wegnhtng

                                                     —                   —                                        km                  UE                 6hUuES        6
                                                                                 ee       en
                                                    sey:                                                                              ee:                ee;                 ee:
                                                    contibutiontoLocateconomy |              se        | 48 | 2+ | se | 20 | a | 2: [ORR] 2 |
                                                     Total Technical Score                   100%        Pg 709
                                                     Normalised Technical Score (Tn)              [too
                                                     PART B - Price element                              aa | Planttive(@) |                     sandPyuidic) |        prewia iD) —_|
                                                     Total Fees (Pc)                                               1                 $1            ,      7                  1
                                                                                               :                                                                                                                      a |
                                                     Price Score                                                  100                100                100                100
                                                    Normalised Price Score (Pn)                                  100                 100                100                100
                                                     |Weighted Price Score (Pw)

                                                     elements
                                                     OTHER DETAILS
                                                       Assesment panel member 1            Allan Hull
                                                        Assesment panel member 2        Cameron Shields
                                                        Assesment panel member 3         Jono Mcintyre
                                                        Assesment panel member 4          David Shing
                                                         Assesment panel member 4        Brian Freeman                       The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
                                                     QBSA LICENCE CHECKED (if applicable)                                                       Contract Administrator's signature:

 Copy of Evaluation Workbook - Allan Hull_V2                                                                                           Page 1                                                                                                                            28/10/2015

                                                                                                                                                                                 Page 13 of 88
Log in to download the original file

2015-11-10 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda(PDF, 6MB).pdf · 6.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.