Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-11-10 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda

of 88

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Page 17 of 88

Final Evaluation
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Attachment 2 Evaluaton Spreadsheet

                                                                                               Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet

                                        [eeravieened Iie                  Fi      546TO13.
                                        iContract No:                         t    516T013    |
                                        aoe                                                                                            i
                                        |Contract Title                       IRPQS for   Supply and De ry of P: ix Conere
                                        L                                    Ik                                                        J
                                    No. [NAME OF TENDERER                                      Schedule of Rates|    {|__| —__ —__-__{_}_+_
                                     1 [Boral Concrete Noosa(A)                                                 ST           Ssecacital       a                &         #       &        "       as:       @     Sha
                                     2 [Noosa Minimix(B) tS
                                     Bo   gee ere   a ener ttgee_a fpnnnennnsnnaton                                          The ratings:
                                     4 (NB. Price                    jor            or         L                   |         +0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criterias and extreme rek
                                     5 opening.  Due fo Schedule of Rates and aninabiltyto   |                               + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a ow standard and high risk
                                     6 |i                Nc          n               Ts                                      + 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
                                     7 |                          fe        —_               a:                    ]         * 60 (sixty) = Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is meritabie and will need to be monitored #f awarded
                                     a]                                                      I                     ]         + 80 (eighty) = Very Good — the content of the submission for that crtena is of a high standard and advantageous
                                     9]                                                      ini                             + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional — the content of the submission for that criteria is firwiess / outstanding and most advantageous
                                     i
                                     11;                                                      if                            Once ail the data is entered the resutant scores based on the price and non price elements are automaticaly calculated for you
                                     1. i                                                   asi:                  ]
                                     13{                                                       L                   |
                                     4)                                                     = i                    |
                                     16 ee       re       et                                =)                    J
                                        NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                                                                        Number of Tenders Evaluated       = [ 2 |
                                        SSS
                                        PO                                                    Do not evaluate
                                                                                                             41                   2
                                        —                                                       Boral Concrete

                                                                                                         Resukant              Resultant
                                                                                               Score (out          Score (out
                                                                                                of 100)         9 | 100)             ,

                                        Total Technical Score                                  Pp 8
                                        Normalised Technical Score (Tn)                       |    CO          |
                                        PART B - Price element                                    ao ee een AN _| Noosa Minimix (B)
                                        panes                                                             es
                                        Average Fees (Pav) $......0....--            $1
                                        Price Score                                                    100                  100
                                        Normalised Price Score (Pn)                                    100                  100
                                        Weighted Price Score (Pw
                                        Total Score of price and non price
                                        jelements
                                        OTHER DETAILS
                                          Assesment panel member 1             Brian Freeman
                                          Assesment panel member 2             John McCarron
                                           Assesment panel member 3               Alan Hull
                                            Assesment panel member 4                                               The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
                                        QBSA LICENCE CHECKED ((f applicable)                                                            Contract Administrator's signature:                                   ee

Evaluation Workbook. xisx                                                                                                           Page 1                                                                                                                          30/10/2015

                                                                                                                                                         Page 17 of 88
Log in to download the original file

2015-11-10 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda(PDF, 6MB).pdf · 6.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.