Original source · versioned page text
2019-03-18 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 18 MARCH 2019
a. A suitably qualified and experienced professional must provide
independent verification that the parameters within the node for the device
in MUSIC modelling have been tested and verified as per Stormwater
Australia (2018) Stormwater Quality Improvement Device Evaluation
Protocol. Version 1.2 December 2018 to achieve the predicted outcomes
in the MUSIC model for the development. For the purpose of this condition,
the suitably qualified and experienced professional must be able to
demonstrate a minimum 10 years urban stormwater testing and modelling
experience and be verified in writing by Stormwater Australia as having an
appropriate reputation and track record within the stormwater industry to
provide such independent advice.
b. Where testing to achieve the certification of the proprietary stormwater
quality improvement device is from an area with rainfall intensities and
patterns that are statistically inconsistent with the region of the Noosa Shire
that the device is to be installed, and / or the size of the development the
device has been tested on is more than 2500m2 smaller than the
development the device is proposed to service, the following additional
conditions apply:
i. The proprietary stormwater device treatment train must be tested and
re-verified in accordance with the Stormwater Australia (2018)
Stormwater Quality Improvement Device Evaluation Protocol.
Version 1.2 December 2018. A suitably qualified and experienced
professional, as verified by Stormwater Australia must use the results
from the onsite testing to re-run the MUSIC node for the proprietary
devices and confirm whether or not the required pollutant reduction
efficiencies of 80% reduction in Total Suspended Solids, 60%
reduction in Total Phosphorous and 45% reduction in Total Nitrogen
for the overall development are delivered.
ii. Where the field results and re-run MUSIC node demonstrate the
required pollution reduction efficiencies for the development are not
met, the applicant must implement additional measures to achieve
the required pollution reduction targets. The additional measures
must include, in order of priority, elevated maintenance, and then
increased treatment capacity of the stormwater quality improvement
devices. Following application of additional measures, the system
must be retested in accordance with Stormwater Australia (2018)
Stormwater Quality Improvement Device Evaluation Protocol.
Version 1.2 December 2018. Where pollution reduction targets
continue to not be demonstrated the proprietary device must be
removed and replaced with a bio-retention device constructed in
accordance with an Operational Works approval or the applicant
must enter into an agreement with Council to provide improved water
quality outcomes within the catchment area.
iii. A separate water quality performance bond must be provided prior to
any pre-start meeting for the development. The water quality
performance bond must be 150% of the cost of water quality
monitoring required to comply with Stormwater Australia (2018)
Stormwater Quality Improvement Device Evaluation Protocol.
Version 1.2 December 2018. The performance bond will be
incrementally returned annually for the value of monitoring works
Page 9 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.