Original source · versioned page text
Information Request MCU23 0007 [As Published]
Note that contaminated water must not exit the site during construction.
Issue – Passing Opportunity & Vehicle Manoeuvrability
The internal driveway between Chainage 40 and 80 is narrow, consists of tight left-hand turns
and a blind corner for exiting vehicles turning left at Chainage 70. Council is concerned this
may result in vehicle accidents. Based off RECOR’s Vehicle Swept Paths Plan (C61) dated
28 March 2022, it is unclear:
• if two B99s can pass each other between Chainage 40 and 80; and
• what systems are in place to avoid collisions where a B99 vehicle turns left at
Chainages 50 and 70 while there is an oncoming B99 vehicle (e.g., parabolic mirrors,
give-way signs/line-marking).
Information Required
4. Provide additional detail demonstrating how the internal driveway between Chainages
40 and 80 will function to avoid vehicle accidents. The additional detail must be prepared
by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of
Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
a. provide Turning Path plans demonstrating that two B99 vehicles can simultaneously
manoeuvre the internal driveway between Chainages 40 and 80 without colliding;
and
b. demonstrate if vehicles can complete the left-hand turns at Chainages 50 and 70
without crossing the centreline of the proposed internal driveway.
c. if vehicles must cross the centreline of the proposed internal driveway during these
left-hand turns and/or cannot simultaneously manoeuvre the internal driveway,
provide comment on what driver has ‘right of way’ to avoid collisions and how this is
indicated.
Issue – Vehicle Swept Paths
RECOR’s Vehicle Swept Paths Plan (C61) dated 28 March 2022 indicates that many of the
proposed carparks may not be functional due to components of the vehicle swept path exiting
the internal driveway or not being shown.
Information Required
5. Provide additional detail and an amended Vehicle Swept Paths Plan that demonstrates
how the proposed carparks are functional. The additional detail and amended plan must
be endorsed by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer
of Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
a. realistic starting and finishing vehicle locations;
b. assume all neighbouring carparks are occupied;
c. provide comment demonstrating if the proposed ‘Visitor’ parking is limited to ‘rear-in’
only and what systems are in place to indicate this to visitors;
d. demonstrate how a B99 vehicle can enter and exit the ‘Existing Dwelling Parking’
without the overhang of vehicle leaving the internal driveway; and
e. demonstrate how a B99 vehicle can enter and exit the southern-most carpark outside
‘Unit B’.
Page 3 of 6
Document Set ID: 22307810
Version: 2, Version Date: 17/02/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Information Request MCU23 0007 [As Published].pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.