Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 2 - Phase 7 Project Summary Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Shire Council Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan: Project 10
Summary
Methodology
Table 2-5 Consequence Criteria
Consequence Community Environment Council
Social Economic Financial Other
Catastrophic Widespread permanent Cost to repair damage to Significant environmental impact One-off loss to Extensive impact on assets
impact to broader properties equal (or with long term effects. Examples Council operating requiring a significant
community’s services almost equal) to the include: budget of >$2M, or replacement or
wellbeing (including to aggregate of all impacted • Serious environmental harm >5% recurrent reconstruction effort. Total
private owned critical properties’ value, with (irreversible, high impact, reduction in branch loss of capability.
infrastructure), or culture widespread repair needed widespread, cases > $50,000 budget.
(e.g. >50% of to damaged properties damage). One or more major
community affected), or across the Noosa region,
• Immediate containment industries’ viability (e.g.
popular activity/use resulting in significant
required, extensive cleanup, tourism, agriculture,
disrupted permanently impairment of Noosa
extensive or ongoing education, construction,
e.g. foreshore parkland economy.
remediation needed. manufacturing, retail or
closed
• Major impact to a protected fishing) within Noosa region
Costs to repair damage to species or habitat greatly threatened.
non-Council owned critical contributing to or causing
infrastructure (excluding localised extinction risk in the A large number of
private properties) Noosa area, requiring long complaints resulting in
prohibitive leading to non- term recovery efforts (>40% negative attention from the
replacement, and/or loss of an ecosystem type, public.
disruption resulting in >40% loss of a species,
significant impairment of locally)
Noosa economy.
Major Major permanent or Major repairs needed to Significant medium to long term Recurrent reduction Major impact on assets
widespread medium damaged properties impact on natural or built in Council operating requiring a programmed
term (somewhat within a section of the environment. budget of $0.5M to repair/replacement
reversible) disruption to community, with cost to Examples include: $1M or $1m to $2M response.
community’s services repair damage to one off loss or 3-
(including to private properties greater than • Material environmental harm 5% of recurrent
(significant effect and extent, A major industry or whole
owned critical 50% of the aggregate reduction in branch
causes $20,001 to $50,000 sector of Noosa economy
infrastructure), property value. budget.
damage). put at risk
wellbeing, or culture
(e.g. up to 50% of • Immediate containment Potential for a large number
Damage costs to non- required, large clean up, of complaints resulting in
community affected or
Council owned critical significant remediation negative attention from the
popular activity/use
infrastructure (excluding required. public.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.